Do You Know?….why it is raining cats and dogs ?!!!!!

Source::::unknown… input from one of my contacts…. an interesting read….

Natarajan
.

** LIFE IN THE 1500’S IN ENGLAND**

The next time you are washing your hands and complain because the water temperature isn’t just how you like it, think about how things used to be In England in 1500s:

Most people got married in June because they took their yearly bath in May, and still smelled” pretty good” by June. so brides carried a bouquet of flowers to hide the body odor. Hence the custom today of carrying a bouquet when getting married.

Baths consisted of a big tub filled with hot water. The man of the house had the privilege of the nice clean water, then all the other sons and men, then the women and finally the children. Last of all the babies. By then the water was so dirty you could actually lose someone in it. Hence the saying,” Don’t throw the baby out with the Bath water.. ”

Houses had thatched roofs-thick straw-piled high, with no wood underneath. It was the only place for animals to get warm, so all the cats and other small animals (mice, bugs) lived in the roof When it rained it became slippery and sometimes the animals would slip and fall off the roof. Hence the saying -” It’s raining cats and dogs”.

There was nothing to stop things from falling into the house.. This posed a real problem in the bedroom where bugs and other droppings could mess up your nice clean bed. Hence, a bed with big posts and a sheet hung over the top afforded some protection. That’s how canopy beds came into existence.

The floor was dirt. Only the wealthy had something other than dirt. Hence the saying, Dirt poor. The wealthy had slate floors that would get slippery in the winter when wet, so they spread thresh (straw) on floor to help keep their footing. As the winter wore on, they added more thresh until, when you opened the door, it would all start slipping outside. A piece of wood was placed in the entranceway. Hence the saying a “thresh hold. ”

திருமலை …முன்னொரு காலத்தில் ….

திருமலை முன்னொரு காலத்தில்…!
source::::”dinamalar”…tamil daily…article by Murugaraj.
Temple images

எங்கே பார்த்தாலும் செழிப்பும், வளமையும் பொங்கி ஒரு பிரமிக்கத்தக்க பிரம்மாண்டமான வளர்ச்சியுடன் காணப்படும் இன்றைய திருமலை ஒரு காலத்தில் எப்படி இருந்தது என்பதை அறிந்தால் நிறைய ஆச்சரியப்படுவீர்கள். யாராக இருந்தாலும் நடந்துதான் போகவேண்டும் என்ற நிலையில் பகலில் மட்டும் ஒரு குழுவாக சேர்ந்து தான் போய்வருவார்கள் அப்போதும் காட்டு விலங்குகளிலிடமிருந்து பாதுகாத்துக் கொள்வதற்காக நிறைய முன் எச்சரிக்கை நடவடிக்கை மேற்கொள்வார்களாம். மேலும் நடக்கமுடியாதவர்களை ஐயப்பன் கோயிலுக்கு அழைத்துச் செல்வது போல டோலி கட்டி தூக்கிச் செல்வார்களாம். போக்குவரத்தை மேம்படுத்தினால் மட்டுமே கோவில் வளர்ச்சி அடையும் என்ற நிலையில் நிறைய சிரமமும், செலவும் செய்து மண் பாதை போட்டிருக்கிறார்கள். அந்த பாதையிலும் முதலில் மாட்டு வண்டிகள் தான் பயணம் சென்றிருக்கின்றன.

பின்னர் மோட்டார் வண்டிகளை விட்டுள்ளனர். ஆனால் வளைந்து, நெளிந்து செல்லும் பாதையில் மோட்டார் வாகனத்தில் பயணம் செய்ய முதலில் மக்கள் அச்சப்பட்டனர். அதன்பக்கத்தில் நின்று புகைப்படம் கூட எடுத்துக் கொள்வார்களாம். ஆனால் மோட்டார் வாகனத்தில் ஏறமாட்டார்களாம். இதன் காரணமாக வெறிச்சோடிய மலைப்பாதையில் எப்போதாவது ஒரு சில வண்டிகள் மட்டும் போய்வருமாம். அதன் பிறகு கொஞ்சம், கொஞ்சமாக பயம் நீங்கி மக்கள் போய்வர இப்போது ஒரு நிமிடத்திற்கு ஓரு பஸ் என்று இடைவெளி இல்லாமல் போய், வந்து கொண்டு இருக்கிறது. ஆனாலும் அனைத்து பஸ்களிலும் கூட்டம் நிரம்பி வழிந்து கொண்டுதான் இருக்கிறது. வரக்கூடியவர்களுக்கு மனதார தரிசனம் என்பது ஒரு பக்கம் இருந்தாலும் வயிராற சாப்பாடு போடவேண்டும் என்பதை மனதில் வைத்து அன்னதானம் திட்டம் துவங்கியதும் திருமலைக்கு வரும் பக்தர்கள் எண்ணிக்கை கணக்கிலடங்காத அளவிற்கு கூடியது. இன்றைய தேதிக்கு வரக்கூடிய பக்தர்களுக்கு இல்லை என்று சொல்லாமல் காலை முதல் இரவு வரை அன்னதானம் படைக்கிறார்கள் அதுவும் பிரமாதமாக.

பெரிதாக வருமானம் வராத நிலையில் உண்டியலில் போடும் பணத்திற்கு பாதுகாவலாக இரண்டு காவல்காரர்கள் வேறு நின்று கொண்டு இருப்பார்களாம். இப்போது அப்படியில்லை, வரக்கூடிய வருமானத்தை கையால் எண்ணமுடியாமல் மெஷின் போட்டுதான் எண்ணுகிறார்கள். அடுக்கி வைக்கிறார்கள், காசுகளை சல்லடைபோட்டு சலித்து பிரிக்கிறார்கள். வருடத்திற்கு ஒரு முறை உண்டியலை திறந்து எண்ணிய காலம் ஒன்று உண்டு. ஆனால் இன்று ஒரே நாளில் அடிக்கடி உண்டியல் நிரம்பிவிடுவாதல் கன்வேயர் பெல்ட் மூலம் காணிக்கைகள் நேரடியாக எண்ணுமிடத்திற்கு சென்றுவிடுகின்றன. நெருக்கமான வீடுகளுக்கு நடுவே சுவாமி, வாகனத்தில் சிரமப்பட்டு ஒரு காலத்தில் வலம்வந்தார், ஆனால் அந்த வீடுகள் எல்லாம் தற்போது இடிக்கப்பட்டு விசாலமான ரோடுகளில் வண்ண விளக்கொளிகளின் கீழ் மிக அழகாக அலங்காரமாக வலம் வருகிறார். இவ்வளவு பெரிய வளர்ச்சி எப்படி ஏற்பட்டது என்பதற்கு சிம்பிளான சில காரணங்கள்தான். பக்தர்களே பிரதானம் என்பதை மனதில் வைத்து அவர்கள் தேவை என்பது சுத்தமான கழிப்பறைகள், மலிவு விலையில் தங்கும் அறைகள், இலவச உணவு, சரிசமமான தரிசனம் என்பதில் கறராக இருந்தார்கள், இருக்கிறார்கள். இதுதான் ஒரு முறை திருமலைக்கு போன பக்தர்களை திரும்ப, திரும்ப திருமலைக்கு போகக்கூடியவர்களாக மாற்றியுள்ளது.   

 

Natarajan

Icon

சென்னை …..பெயர் எப்படி வந்தது ? How did chennai get its name?

source:::: tamil thayagam net

Natarajan

Very interesting article on how chennai got its name

சென்னை என்ற பெயருக்கும் அங்குள்ள பல இடங்களின் பெயருக்கும் அந்த பெயர்கள் எப்படி வந்தன என்று தெரியுமா ? தொடர்ந்து படியுங்கள் :

சென்னை: –
சென்னபசவ நாயக்கன் என்பவன் தான் ஆண்ட பகுதியை 1600 வருடம் வாக்கில் வெறும் 10000 ரூபாய்க்கு கிழக்கிந்திய கம்பனியாரிடம் விற்றுவிட்டாராம். அவர் ஆண்ட பகுதியின் ஞாபகமாய சென்னப் பட்டணம் என்று அழைக்கப்பட்ட இடம் சென்னையாகி விட்டது.

மதராஸ் :-
முகமதியர்கள் பலர் இங்கே பள்ளிவாசல்களை நிறுவி தொழுகை நடத்தியபடி இருந்ததால், மதராஸே என்று அழைக்கப்பட்டது பின் நாளில் மெட்ராஸாகிவிட்டது.

கோடம்பாக்கம் –
கோடா பாக் : குதிரைகளும் அதை வளர்ப்பவர்களும் நிறைந்த பகுதியாய் இருந்த இடம் இன்று கோடம்பாக்கம் ஆகிவிட்டது.

மாம்பலம்:
மாம்லான் எனும் ஆங்கிலேய கலக்டெர் தங்கியிருந்த இடம் இன்று மாம்பலமாகி விட்டது

மற்றொரு பெயர் காரணம்

மா அம்பலம் :-
ஒரு காலத்தில் மிகப் பெரிய சிவாலயம் இங்கிருந்ததாகவும் அந்த ஆலயம் அடங்கிய பகுதி மா அம்பலம் என வழங்கப் பட்டதாம். இன்றைய க்ருஷ்ணவேணி திரையரங்கமே ஒரு கோவில் மிகப் பெரிய திருக்குளம் என்று சொல்லப்படுகிறது.

சைதாப்பேட்டை: சதயு புரம் :
சதயு எனும் மன்னன் 108 சிவாலயங்களை எழுப்பினான். அதில் 108வது சிவாலயம் சதயுபுரத்தில் இருக்கும் திருக்காரணீசன். சதயுபுரம் கூப்பிட வசதியாய் சைதாபேட்டையாகிவிட்டது.

கிண்டி:-
ப்ருங்கி முனிவர் தன்னுடைய தவக்காலத்தில் பூஜைக்கான கிண்டியைப் பொருத்திய இடம் இன்று கிண்டியாகிவிட்டது.

பரங்கிமலை:-
ப்ருங்கி முனிவர் வழிபட்ட சிவாலயம் இன்றும் பரங்கி மலையில் இருப்பதாகச் சொல்கிறார்கள். சர்ச்சுக்குள் பழைய கோவிலின் கட்டமைப்புகள் இருப்பாதாகச் சொல்லப்படுகிறது (ஆய்வுக்குரியது).

சேத்துப்பட்டு:
மண்பாண்டம் செய்யும் குயவர்கள் அதற்கான மண்ணை இந்த பகுதியில் சேறு போல் குழைத்து மாட்டு வண்டியில் எடுத்துச் செல்வார்களாம். சேறு குழைத்த இடம் சேற்றுப்பட்டு.

எழுமூர்:
இன்றும் சென்னையில் சூர்யோதயம் விழும் முதலிடம் எழுமூர். பூமி மட்டத்தின் மேல் தளத்தில் உள்ளது. சூரியன் எழுமூர் இன்று எழும்பூராகிவிட்டது. இதற்கு சாட்சி, தாஸப்ரகாஷ் அருகிலுள்ள சந்தில் இருக்கும் சிவனுக்கு எழுமீஸ்வரர் என்று பெயர்.திருநாவுக்கரசரால் வைப்புத் தலமாய் பாடப்பட்ட திருத்தலம்.

ராயபுரம்:
பல்லவ மன்னனின் அமைச்சரவையில் இருந்த ராயர்களுக்கு ஒதுக்கப்பட்ட மானியம் ராயர்புரம் இன்று ராயபுரம்.

சிந்தாதரிப்பேட்டை: சின்ன தறிப் பேட்டை :
சிறிய அள்விலே தறி வைத்துக்கொண்டு குழந்தைகளுக்கான துணிகளை நெய்த பகுதி இன்று சிந்தாதரிப்பேட்டை.

தண்டையார்பேட்டை :
பல்லவ ராஜ்யத்தில் உள்ள கோவில்களின் கைங்கர்ய தொண்டை ப்ரதிபலன் பாராது ஆற்றி வந்த அன்பர்களுக்கான் குடியிருப்புக்கு கொடுக்கப் பட்ட மான்யம் தொண்டையார் புரி இன்று தண்டையார் பேட்டை.

புரசவாக்கம்: புரசைப் பாக்கம்:
புரசுக் காடுகள் மண்டியிருந்த பகுதி இன்று புரசவாக்கம்.

அமிஞ்சிகரை: அமைந்தகரை அமர்ந்தகரை:
ராமபிரான் (லவகுசர்களிடம் போரிட்டு வெற்றி காண முடியாமல்) அமர்ந்த கூவக்கரை இன்று அமைந்தகரை.

செங்கல்பட்டு: செங்கழுநீர் பட்டு :
செங்கழுநீர் பூக்கள் நிறைந்த குளங்களை நிறைய கொண்ட இடம் இன்று செங்கல்பட்டு.

பெருங்களத்தூர் :
பெரிய பெரிய குளங்களை தன்னகத்தே கொண்ட விவசாய பூமி இன்று பெரிய குளத்தூர் இன்று பெருங்களத்தூர்.

பல்லாவரம்:
பல்லவபுரம் பல்லவர்கள் எழுப்பிய சமணப்பள்ளிகள் உள்ள இடம். அனகாபுத்தூர் அருகே இன்றும் காணலாம்.

பரங்கிமலை:-
பரங்கியர் என ஆங்கிலேயருக்குப் பெயர். St. Thomas Mount -ல் பரங்கிப் படையினர் வசித்ததனால், அது பரங்கிமலையாக வழங்கியிருக்க வேண்டும். மற்றோர் உதாரணம் – பரங்கிப் பேட்டை – Porto Novo – போர்த்துகீசியரின் கோட்டை – கடலூர் அருகிலுள்ளது.

பூந்தமல்லி :
பூந்தண் எனும் அசுரனுக்கு ஈசன் மோக்ஷம் கொடுத்த இடம். மல்லிகாடுகள் அடர்ந்த இடம் இன்று பூந்தமல்லி.

நந்தம்பாக்கம்:
நந்தர்கள் எனும் வம்சத்தவர்கள் ராமனை வரவேற்ற இடம் இன்று நந்தம்பாக்கம்.

ராமாபுரம்:
ராமபிரான் தங்கிய மாஞ்சோலை இன்று ராமாபுரம்.

போரூர்:
முருகப்பெருமான் சூரஸம்ஹாரத்திற்கு ஆயுதம் எடுத்த இடம் இன்று போரூர்.

குன்றத்தூர்:
குன்றுகள் நிறைந்த ஊர் (சீக்கிரம் போய் பாருங்க… ஏன்னா மல முழுங்கிங்க புல் டோசரோட காலி பண்ணிக்கிட்டிருக்காங்க).

ஸ்ரீ பெரும் பூதூர்:
அசுர பூதங்கள் நிர்மாணம் பண்ணிய சிவாலயபுரி இன்று ஸ்ரீ பெரும்புதூர்.

சுங்குவார் சத்திரம்:
பழங்காலத்தில் வரி வசூலித்த டோல்கேட் இன்று சுங்குவார் சத்திரம்.

நந்தனம்:-
மா அம்பலத்திலிருந்த சிவாலய நந்தவனம் இருந்த இடம் இன்று நந்தனம். இங்கு பூமியுலிருந்து எடுக்கப்பட்ட நந்தி சிஐடி நகரில் இருக்கிறது.

யானை கவுணி :
திருக்குடை வைபவத்தில் எம்பெருமான் யானை போல் ஒடி தாண்டினாராம்.ஒரே சமயத்தில் இரண்டு ரயில்வே கேட்டுகள் போடப்பட்ட பெரிய நுழைவயில் யானகவுணி.

மாதவரம்:
மாதவன் ஈசனிடம் வரம் பெற்ற இடம் இன்று மாதவரம். புராதன சிவ்-விஷ்ணு ஆலயங்கள் உள்ளன.

வளசரவாக்கம்: வள்ளி சேர் பாக்கம்:
முருகப் பெருமான் வள்ளியோடு சேர்ந்த இடம் இன்று வளசரவாக்கம். இங்கு 7 அடி முருக விக்ரகம் பூமியிலிருந்து கிடைத்து கோவில் கட்டியிருக்கிறார்கள். எல்லா டீவி சீரியலிலும் தவறாமல் இக்கோவில் வரும்.

ஈக்காட்டுதாங்கல் :
ஈர காடு தங்கல் : வருடத்தில் ஒருநாள் திருவல்லிக்கேணி பார்த்தசாரதி பெருமாள் இங்கே ராத்தங்கலுக்கு வருவார். எங்குபார்த்தாலும் தண்ணீரில் மிதக்கும் காட்டிற்கு நடுவே எம்பெருமானின் சோலை இருந்ததாம். இன்று ஸ்வாஹா…….

முகப்பேர் : மகப்பேர் ஸந்தானபுரி.

முகலிவாக்கம் :
கோவூர் ஈசனின் க்ரீடம் (மௌளி) இருந்த இடம் மௌளிவாக்கம் இன்று முகலிவாக்கம்.

அயனாவரம்: அயன் (ப்ரஹ்ம்மா பூசித்த சிவன்) வரம் பெற்ற இடம்.

(இணையத்தில் இருந்து)

History of Hinduism….

SOURCE::::: Input from one of my contacts…. an interesting read…..
natarajan

History of Hinduism

Satellite map of IndiaIndia

Hinduism’s early history is the subject of much debate for a number of reasons.
Firstly, in a strict sense there was no ‘Hinduism’ before modern times, although the sources of Hindu traditions are very ancient.
Secondly, Hinduism is not a single religion but embraces many traditions.
Thirdly, Hinduism has no definite starting point. The traditions which flow into Hinduism may go back several thousand years and some practitioners claim that the Hindu revelation is eternal.
Although there is an emphasis on personal spirituality, Hinduism’s history is closely linked with social and political developments, such as the rise and fall of different kingdoms and empires. The early history of Hinduism is difficult to date and Hindus themselves tend to be more concerned with the substance of a story or text rather than its date.

Hindu notions of time

Hindus in general believe that time is cyclical, much like the four seasons, and eternal rather than linear and bounded. Texts refer to successive ages (yuga), designated respectively as golden, silver, copper and iron.
During the golden age people were pious and adhered todharma (law, duty, truth) but its power diminishes over time until it has to be reinvigorated through divine intervention.
With each successive age, good qualities diminish, until we reach the current iron or dark age (kali yuga) marked by cruelty, hypocrisy, materialism and so on. Such ideas challenge the widespread, linear view that humans are inevitably progressing.

Main historical periods

Although the early history of Hinduism is difficult to date with certainty, the following list presents a rough chronology.

Indus Valley Civilisation

The Indus Valley Civilisation (before 2000 BCE)

Satellite image of Indus river basin with modern international boundaries markedThe Indus basin ©

The Indus Valley civilisation was located in the basin of the river Indus, which flows through present day Pakistan. It had developed by about 2500 BCE although its origins reach back to the Neolithic period. It had faded away by 1500 BCE.
The Indus Valley was a developed urban culture akin to the civilisations of Mesopotamia. Two major cities have been uncovered, Mohenjo-Daro and Harappa, which has given us the alternative name of Harappan culture. These cities housed about 40,000 people who enjoyed quite a high standard of living with sophisticated water systems; most houses having drainage systems, wells, and rubbish chutes. Grain was the basis of the economy and large grain stores collected grain as tax.
The civilisation was extensive, from the eastern foothills of the Himalayas, to Lothar on the Gujarat coast, and to Sutgagen Dor near the Iranian border. Some cities of the Indus valley culture have yet to be excavated.
The Indus civilisation did not develop as a result of contact with other civilisations such as Sumer or Egypt but was an indigenous development growing out of earlier, local cultures.

Religion in the Indus valley

We know little of the religion, social structure or politics of this early civilisation and we do not know the language, but seals have been found with what looks like a script inscribed on them. This has not been deciphered successfully and some scholars now question whether it is in fact a script, although this is contentious.

Abstract, gently curving carving of seated male torso and arms, the head broken offMale figure found at Mohenjo-Daro. Photo: Amir Taj ©

Religion in the Indus valley seems to have involved temple rituals and ritual bathing in the ‘great bath’ found at Mohenjo-Daro. There is some evidence of animal sacrifice at Kalibangan. A number of terracotta figurines have been found, perhaps goddess images, and a seal depicting a seated figure surrounded by animals that some scholars thought to be a prototype of the god Shiva. Others have disputed this, pointing out that it bears a close resemblance to Elamite seals depicting seated bulls. One image, carved on soapstone (steatite), depicts a figure battling with lions which is reminiscent of the Mesopotamian Gilgamesh myth.
There may be continuities between the Indus Valley civilisation and later Hinduism as suggested by the apparent emphasis on ritual bathing, sacrifice, and goddess worship. But ritual purity, sacrifice and an emphasis on fertility are common to other ancient religions.

Vedic Period

The Vedic Period (c.1500–c.500 BCE)

There have been two major theories about the early development of early south Asian traditions.
  1. The Aryan migration thesis that the Indus Valley groups calling themselves ‘Aryans’ (noble ones) migrated into the sub-continent and became the dominant cultural force. Hinduism, on this view, derives from their religion recorded in the Veda along with elements of the indigenous traditions they encountered.
  2. The cultural transformation thesis that Aryan culture is a development of the Indus Valley culture. On this view there were no Aryan migrations (or invasion) and the Indus valley culture was an Aryan or vedic culture.
There are two sources of knowledge about this ancient period – language and archaeology – and we can make two comments about them. Firstly, the language of vedic culture was vedic Sanskrit, which is related to other languages in the Indo-European language group. This suggests that Indo-European speakers had a common linguistic origin known by scholars as Proto-Indo-European.

Sanskrit manuscriptPage of the Rig Veda in Sanskrit: early 19th century Indian manuscript ©

Secondly, there does seem to be archaeological continuity in the subcontinent from the Neolithic period. The history of this period is therefore complex. One of the key problems is that no horse remains have been found in the Indus Valley but in the Veda the horse sacrifice is central. The debate is ongoing.

Vedic religion

If we take ‘Vedic Period’ to refer to the period when the Vedaswere composed, we can say that early vedic religion centred around the sacrifice and sharing the sacrificial meal with each other and with the many gods (devas). The term ‘sacrifice’ (homayajna) is not confined to offering animals but refers more widely to any offering into the sacred fire (such as milk and clarified butter).
Some of the vedic rituals were very elaborate and continue to the present day. Sacrifice was offered to different vedic gods (devas) who lived in different realms of a hierarchical universe divided into three broad realms: earth, atmosphere and sky.
Earth contains the plant god Soma, the fire god Agni, and the god of priestly power, Brhaspati. The Atmosphere contains the warrior Indra, the wind Vayu, the storm gods or Maruts and the terrible Rudra. The Sky contains the sky god Dyaus (from the same root as Zeus), the Lord of cosmic law (or rta) Varuna, his friend the god of night Mitra, the nourisher Pushan, and the pervader Vishnu.

Epic, Puranic and Classical Age

The Epic, Puranic and Classical Age (c.500 BCE–500 CE)

Sanskrit manuscriptArjun and one of his brothers, two of the heroes of the Mahabharata. Dasavatara Temple, Deogarh, 6th century. Photo: Vaticanus©

This period, beginning from around the time of Buddha (died c. 400 BCE), saw the composition of further texts, theDharma Sutras and Shastras, the two Epics, the Mahabharata and theRamayana, and subsequently thePuranas, containing many of the stories still popular today. The famousBhagavad Gita is part of theMahabharata.
The idea of dharma (law, duty, truth) which is central to Hinduism was expressed in a genre of texts known as Dharma Sutras and Shastras. The Dharma Sutras recognise three sources of dharma: revelation (i.e. the Veda), tradition (smrti), and good custom. The Laws of Manu adds ‘what is pleasing to oneself’.
During this period the vedic fire sacrifice became minimised with the development of devotional worship (puja) to images of deities in temples. The rise of the Gupta Empire (320-500 CE) saw the development of the great traditions of Vaishnavism (focussed on Vishnu), Shaivism (focussed on Shiva) and Shaktism (focussed on Devi).
From this period we can recognise many elements in present day Hinduism, such as bhakti (devotion) and temple worship. This period saw the development of poetic literature. These texts were composed in Sanskrit, which became the most important element in a shared culture.

Medieval Period

Medieval Period (500 CE–1500 CE)

Pyramidal granite temple covered with sculpture and statuesTemple to Sri Brahadeeswarar (Shiva) in Tanjavur, the world’s first granite temple, built 1004–1009 CE ©

From 500 CE we have the rise of devotion (bhakti) to the major deities, particularly Vishnu, Shiva and Devi. With the collapse of the Gupta empire, regional kingdoms developed which patronised different religions. For example, the Cholas in the South supported Shaivism.
This period saw the development of the great regional temples such as Jagganatha in Puri in Orissa, the Shiva temple in Cidambaram in Tamilnadu, and the Shiva temple in Tanjavur, also in Tamilnadu. All of these temples had a major deity installed there and were centres of religious and political power.

Poet-saints and gurus

During this time not only religious literature in Sanskrit developed but also in vernacular languages, particularly Tamil. Here poet-saints recorded their devotional sentiments. Most notable are the twelve Vaishnava Alvars (6th–9th centuries), including one famous female poet-saint called Andal, and the sixty-three Shaiva Nayanars (8th–10th centuries).
Subsequent key thinkers and teachers (acharyas or gurus) consolidated these teachings. They formulated new theologies, perpetuated by their own disciplic successions (sampradaya).
Shankara (780–820) travelled widely, defeating scholars of the unorthodox movements, Buddhism and Jainism, which around the turn of the millennium had established prominent seats of learning throughout India. He re-established the authority of the Vedic canon, propagated advaita (monism) and laid foundations for the further development of the tradition known as the Vedanta.

The philosopher Madhva seatedMadhva (c.1238–c.1317, Vaishnava saint and founder of the philosophical school Dvaita Vedanta©

Developments in Vaishnavism and Shaivism

The Vaishnava philosophers Ramanuja (c. 1017–1137), Madhva (13th cent) and others followed, writing their own scriptural commentaries, propounding new theologies and establishing their own successions. Ramanuja qualified Shankara’s impersonal philosophy, and Madhva more strongly propounded the existence of a personal God.
Shaivism similarly developed during this period with important philosophers such as Abhinavagupta (c. 975–1025) writing commentaries on the Tantras, an alternative revelation to the Veda, and other texts.
The Tantras became revered as a revelation that fulfilled or superseded the Veda. Some of these texts advocated ritually polluting practices such as offering alcohol, meat and ritualised sex to ferocious deities but most of these texts are simply concerned with daily and occasional rituals, temple building, cosmology and so on.

Pre-Modern Period

The Pre-Modern Period (c.1500–1757 CE)

Elephants and cavalry carved in marbleMarble elephants at Jagdish Temple in Udaipur, Rajasthan (1651 CE). Photo: Christopher Walker ©

Alongside the development of Hindu traditions, most widespread in the South, was the rise of Islam in the North as a religious and political force in India. The new religion of Islam reached Indian shores around the 8th century, via traders plying the Arabian Sea and the Muslim armies which conquered the northwest provinces.
Muslim political power began with the Turkish Sultanate around 1200 CE and culminated in the Mughul Empire (from 1526). Akbar (1542–1605) was a liberal emperor and allowed Hindus to practice freely. However, his great grandson, Aurangzeb (1618–1707), destroyed many temples and restricted Hindu practice.
During this period we have further developments in devotional religion (bhakti). The Sant tradition in the North, mainly in Maharashtra and the Panjab, expressed devotion in poetry to both a god without qualities (nirguna) and to a god with qualities (saguna) such as parental love of his devotees.
The Sant tradition combines elements of bhakti, meditation or yoga, and Islamic mysticism. Even today the poetry of the princess Mirabai, and other saints such as Tukaram, Surdas and Dadu are popular.

British Period

British Period (1757–1947 CE)

Old map of British Indian EmpireMap of British Indian Empire, 1909 ©

Robert Clive’s victory at the Battle of Plassey (1757) heralded the end of the Mughul Empire and the rise of British supremacy in India.
At first, the British did not interfere with the religion and culture of the Indian people, allowing Hindus to practice their religion unimpeded. Later, however, missionaries arrived preaching Christianity. Shortly after, the first scholars stepped ashore, and though initially sympathetic, were often motivated by a desire to westernise the local population. Chairs of Indology were established in Oxford and other universities in Europe.

Hindu reformers

The nineteenth century saw the development of the ‘Hindu Renaissance’ with reformers such as Ram Mohan Roy (1772–1833) presenting Hinduism as a rational, ethical religion and founding the Brahmo Samaj to promote these ideas.
Another reformer, Dayananda Sarasvati (1824–83), advocated a return to vedic religion which emphasised an eternal, omnipotent and impersonal God. He wanted to return to the ‘eternal law’ orsanatana dharma of Hinduism before the Puranas and Epics through his society, the Arya Samaj.
Both of these reformers wished to rid Hinduism of what they regarded as superstition. These groups were instrumental in sowing the seeds of Indian nationalism and Hindu missionary movements that later journeyed to the West.
Another important figure was Paramahamsa Ramakrishna (1836-86), who declared the unity of all religions. His disciple Vivekananda (1863–1902) developed his ideas and linked them to a political vision of a united India.
 

Paramahamsa RamakrishnaA shrine to Paramahamsa Ramakrishna at Mysore. Photo: Chetan Hegde M ©

Gandhi drew much of his strength and conviction from the Hindu teachings, such as the notion of ahimsa (non-violence), and propounded a patriotism that was broad-minded and magnanimous.

 

History of Apple Logo……

SOURCE::::NIDOKIDOS NET….An interesting story to read share….

Natarajan

The first Apple logo was designed in 1976 by Ronald Wayne, sometimes referred to as the third co-founder of Apple. The logo depicts Isaac Newton sitting under a tree, an apple dangling precipitously above his head. The phrase on the outside border reads, “Newton… A Mind Forever Voyaging Through Strange Seas of Thought … Alone.”

The Rainbow Logo: 1976-1998

Not surprisingly, the above logo only lasted a year before Steve Jobs commissioned graphic designer Rob Janoff to come up with something, oh I don’t know, a little bit more modern. Janoff’s eventual design would go on to become one of the most iconic and recognizable corporate logos in history.

According to Janoff, the “bite” in the Apple logo was originally implemented so that people would know that it represented an apple, and not a tomato. It also lent itself to a nerdy play on words (bite/byte), a fitting reference for a tech company. Quick sidenote: Corporate design sure was a lot simpler in the 70′s. Nowadays, companies like Pepsi spend millions of dollars on logo re-designs that are based on complete BS and new age mumbo jumbo.

As for the rainbow stripes of the logo, Steve Jobs is rumored to have insisted on using a colorful logo as a means to “humanize” the company. Janoff has said that there was no rhyme or reason behind the placement of the colors themselves, noting that he wanted to have green at the top “because that’s where the leaf was.”

The relatively simple origins of the rainbow colored Apple logo hasn’t stopped some from reading a bit too much into what it represents. Jean-Louis Gassée, former Apple executive and founder of BeOS, quipped about the logo:

One of the deep mysteries to me is our logo, the symbol of lust and knowledge, bitten into, all crossed with the colors of the rainbow in the wrong order. You couldn’t dream a more appropriate logo: lust, knowledge, hope and anarchy.

The passion of the French knows no bounds!

The multi-colored Apple logo was in use for 22 years before it was axed by Steve Jobs less than a year after his return to Apple in 1997. In its place was a new logo that did away with the colorful stripes and replaced it with a more modern monochromatic look that has taken on a variety of sizes and colors over the past few years. The overall shape of the logo, however, remains unchanged from its original inception 33 years ago.

The Monochrome Logo: 1998 – Present

TInkering with one of the most recognizable logos in the world wasn’t done simply because Steve Jobs is always looking to change things up. When Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, the company was bleeding money, and Jobs and Co. realized that the Apple logo could be leveraged to their advantage. That meant experimenting with larger logos to make it more prominent. If the shape of the Apple logo was universally recognizable, why not not put it where people could see it?

That being the case, placing a large rainbow Apple logo on top of the original Bondi Blue iMac, for example, would have looked silly, childish, and out of place. Not exactly the direction Jobs wanted to lead Apple in. So instead of placing a somewhat minuscule rainbow colored Apple logo on its products, Apple began placing sizeable and Monochrome styled logos on its products in all sorts of places: on top of the original iMac, on the side of the Powermac G3 Tower, and in an assortment of colors on the good ole iBooks. This trend, which began in 1998, continues to this day.

The rainbow colored logo might always be a source of nostalgia for Mac enthusiasts, but the monochrome logo allows Apple greater flexibility when it comes to branding its products. Also, Steve Jobs isn’t exactly the type to get wrapped up in warm fuzzy feelings of nostalgia. When Jobs returned to Apple, he needed to transform Apple’s image from that of a failing company into one capable of churning out sleek and cutting edge products, and he needed a new logo to match. It doesn’t appear likely that Apple will change up its logo again anytime soon, but one thing that will undoubtedly remain is the shape of the logo itself.

Why Apple had to abandon the rainbow

The rainbow logo just wouldn’t fit on the iMac pictured to the right. Rainbow on beige? Alright. Rainbow on metal? Not so much.

Imagine if MacBooks looked like this?! I think Apple made the right call.

Man Landing on Moon in 1969 ….Was it Too Early?!!!

Source::::Article by Michael Hanlon…. “THE TELEGRAPH”….
Natarajan

Neil Armstrong: one giant leap into the dark
Putting a man on the Moon in 1969 was a formidable achievement, but did Neil Armstrong make his small step on to the surface 50 years too early, asks Michael Hanlon.

“I was one of the 600 million people who watched Neil Armstrong’s Small Step on to the Sea of Tranquility live on tiny black and white televisions. Dragged out of bed in the early hours on July 21 1969, I only vaguely understood what was happening. I was four and a half.
But I knew that a man on the Moon was a big deal. Back then, everyone assumed this was indeed a giant leap into the future, the beginning of a space age not for the chosen few but for us all. By the time I was at school, we all took it for granted that we would be following in Armstrong’s footsteps when we grew up.
We collected the Apollo badges and, later, glued together Airfix models of the magnificent spacecraft, towering machines that looked more like cathedrals than vehicles.
The future beckoned, as shiny-white as those sundrenched rockets on their Florida launchpads. I was one of the millions back then who fell in love with space and it is partly thanks to Neil Armstrong and fellow crew member Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin that I write books about it and have tried to meet as many of the Moonwalkers as I can. But sadly, that dream that I and others would be able to follow in their footsteps one day was not to be.
They are all old men, now, the Moonwalkers, and with the death of Armstrong there are just eight humans left alive who have walked on the surface of another world. When they are gone, we will have lost the last living links with what British space historian Dr David Harland has called “a piece of the 21st century transported into the 1960s”.

As the Apollo programme recedes into history, the more unreal it seems. Back in 1961, just 57 years after Wilbur and Orville Wright first took to the air in their string-and-canvas contraptions, President John F Kennedy pledged to put an American on the Moon and bring him home again before 1970. Only one person, the Russian Yuri Gagarin, had flown in space. America’s manned space programme, Mercury, was embryonic and the US had to rely on the former-Nazi rocketeer Wernher von Braun to telescope what should have realistically taken 40 years into less than a decade.

For Apollo to succeed, a whole technology had to be created from scratch. This meant not just firing space capsules into space and splashing them down again, but assembling large complex craft in orbit, keeping humans alive in the radiation-drenched vacuum of outer space for days at a time and somehow navigating across a quarter of a million miles of space with pinpoint accuracy.
It meant not just building a rocket capable of propelling 120 tons of material into orbit (the mighty Saturn V) but developing computers powerful enough and small enough to fit into a capsule. It is a myth that Apollo gave us Teflon, but without that programme we would have had to wait a lot longer for the computer revolution to arrive (the Apollo Guidance Computer was the direct ancestor of your laptop or iPhone).
But the technology alone would have been nothing without finding a new breed of heroes to ride in and operate these magnificent machines. America’s astronauts defied easy categorisation. Armstrong himself was two parts warrior and hyper-fit macho hero to one part pensive engineering and aeronautics-obsessed geek.
I have been privileged to meet four of the Moonwalkers. They are indeed men apart. All brilliant, some prickly. Armstrong was usually described as a “recluse”, but he was not; this being a word used by journalists to mean “does not give interviews”. One got the impression that it was all too much, the sheer weight of expectation upon the shoulders of the first Moonwalker more than any human could handle.
The second man on the Moon, Buzz Aldrin, like most astronauts preferred then and now to talk about flying and the mathematics of celestial navigation than about the glory. Aldrin, an intense, extraordinarily intelligent man, told me that one of the mistakes made by NASA was “that we never sent anyone who could really communicate what was happening”. As well as engineers and pilots, the Moonwalkers should have included writers, a poet perhaps, or an artist among the pilot-jocks. Then, along with the seismographs and geological samples, the analysis of the lunar soil and measurements of craters and mountains, we would have heard how the Moon smells of gunpowder and tastes of burnt sulphur; of how, after taking their bulky suits off in the module, moon dust and grit would get into every crack and crevice on the body, of the cold and the terror, and exactly what it is like to gaze up at the Earth, a blue and green orb that from the Moon appears four times the size that the Moon does from our world.
And the Moon – the reality of it – has remained a missed opportunity for art and literature. Even as Armstrong, Aldrin and the Command Module pilot Mike Collins were on their way, the decision was being made to abort humanity’s giant leap into the cosmos.
Politics played a big part. Richard Nixon inherited Apollo from his hated rival JFK and, while he was happy to bathe in the reflected glory of Apollo 11, he saw no need to follow it up with the planned Moon bases and manned missions to Mars that von Braun insisted were possible by 1985. The last three Moon missions – Apollos 18, 19 and 20 – were quietly cancelled, a tragic decision as the rockets had been built and the money already spent. NASA’s grand vision shrank to a parochial horizon of space stations and shuttles, missions that were banal in their ambition and scope and in which the public soon lost interest.
Even during its pomp, when Apollo was hoovering up about 4 per cent of America’s GDP, polls showed a distinct lack of enthusiasm for manned spaceflight. For the enthusiasts, of which there were millions, Apollo was the most important adventure in the history of mankind. But for the rest – many more millions, it was as relevant as Dorothy’s journey to Oz.
So perhaps the greatest irony of Apollo was that its very success ended human expansion into space. Armstrong’s triumph was not the beginning of something new; it was, in fact, the beginning of the end. By meeting JFK’s absurd, vainglorious deadline, NASA won the space race, but the thing about races is that when they are won, they are over. It is a myth that America turned its back on space because of the cost; America’s wars consume far more cash than even Apollo did. There has always been the money – what has been lacking since JFK made his pledge has been vision and will.
A further irony is that while enthusiasm for real space exploration may have been limited, America’s – and the rest of the world’s – enthusiasm for fake space exploration has, since the Apollo years, boomed. The US spends far more money playing computer games and watching movies about pretend aliens and astronauts than it does on NASA. The most successful films ever made – Avatar, Star Wars, ET and the rest – have been about aliens and imagined futures in space. Here in Britain the BBC has proclaimed that Dr Who, a science fiction TV series that began in the Apollo era, may go on for ever.
My belief is that Apollo was simply a programme out of its time, a dead-end simply because it came 50, maybe even 100 years too early. We went to the Moon and simply didn’t know what to do next, just as the Vikings discovered America half a millennium before they should. In a recent, rare interview, Armstrong bemoaned the lack of direction at NASA, and he was right. Today, it is perhaps unsurprising that so many people believe he never actually went to the Moon or stepped on its surface, that the landing was brilliantly faked.
We are still exploring space, of course, but by proxy, using machines such as the brilliant Curiosity rover that landed on Mars last week. NASA’s hopes of getting a man on Mars and beyond are doomed and it is probably best for now to leave it to the robots, to search for life in the cosmos and leave the giant leaps to someone else. Because someone – most likely the Chinese or privateers – will one day take up the Apollo mantle from Armstrong, Aldrin, Conrad, Bean, Shepard, Mitchell, Scott, Irwin, Young, Duke, Cernan and Schmitt. But for the surviving Moonmen, and maybe even for people of my generation, that day will probably come too late.”

Michael Hanlon is the author of ‘The Real Mars’ and ‘The Worlds of Galileo’, which chronicle the robotic exploration of the Solar System