Pilot Fast Asleep While at Control…But Safe Flight !!!

Air New Zealand

Air New Zealand says even though one of the two pilots fell into a deep sleep at the controls of the international flight “safety was not compromised at any point”. Picture: Mark Coote/Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

AIR New Zealand said that one of its pilots fell into a deep sleep while at the controls of an international flight but insisted that safety aboard the aircraft was never compromised.

He was one of two pilots flying a 332-seat Boeing 777-300ER from London to Los Angeles in November 2011, according to a report released after a freedom of information request.

The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) document said the pilot voluntarily submitted a “fatigue report” with the regulator, recounting how he slept on the job.

The pilot, who was not identified, blamed a poor night’s rest in London, when air-conditioning problems in his hotel meant he had to change rooms three times, for his exhausted state on the flight.

“I suddenly, and without any warning, fell into a deep sleep on the flight deck. The same event occurred twice,” he said.

Air New Zealand said safety was paramount for the airline and it encouraged staff to report instances of fatigue as part of a programme to manage shift rosters to address the issue.

It said the flight in question had three pilots aboard.

“During the cruise phase of the flight one of the two operating pilots nodded off twice for around a minute and woke spontaneously,” it said in a statement.

“The other operating pilot on the flight deck was aware of this and safety was not compromised at any point.”

Air New Zealand said the pilot would not face disciplinary action as it did not want to discourage staff from reporting such incidents.
source:::::news.com.au

Natarajan

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/travel/news/air-new-zealand-pilot-was-asleep-while-at-the-controls-but-plane-was-safe-says-airline/story-e6frfq80-1226588606045#ixzz2MHxcQzeX

When All the Four Engines Failed of a British Airways 747…

The Best Airline Captain Announcement Ever Came On A British Airways 747 After All Four Engines Failed……

 

Photo of British Airways 747

British Airways

A British Airways 747-400

In 1982, a British Airways 747 flew into a cloud of volcanic ash near Indonesia. 

One by one, all four of its engines failed.

After falling more than 25,000 feet and preparing to ditch in the Indian Ocean, the plane’s crew eventually got the engines restarted. So the story had a happy ending.

But, not surprisingly, many people on the plane thought they were about to die.

I am old enough to remember this incident, but I had forgotten something important about it: What the plane’s captain said to the passengers the moment after the engines failed. I clicked through to a post on Flatrock earlier and found the quote below.

Captain Eric Moody was later praised for a cabin announcement that was described as “a masterpiece of understatement.”

Moody’s announcement was actually more than that.

It was a masterpiece, period. If an exceptional speechwriter had spent a week composing the message, he or she couldn’t have done better.

In 37 short, direct, and simple words, Captain Moody conveyed the following:

  • What was happening
  • The urgency of the situation
  • The crew’s intense focus on the problem (without false assurances that they could fix it)
  • Concern for the well-being of the passengers (without being patronizing)
  • A dry sense of perspective that probably did more to relax the passengers than thousands of words of explanation ever could have.

 

Captain Eric Moody

BA

Captain Eric Moody

Here’s what Moody said: 

“Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem. All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them going again. I trust you are not in too much distress.”

And here’s Wikipedia’s description of the incident:

British Airways Flight 9, sometimes referred to by its callsign Speedbird 9 or Jakarta incident,[1] was a scheduled British Airways flight from London Heathrow to Auckland, with stops in BombayMadrasKuala LumpurPerth, and Melbourne.

On 24 June 1982, the route was flown by the City of Edinburgh, a 747-236B. The aircraft flew into a cloud of volcanic ash thrown up by the eruption of Mount Galunggung (approximately 180 kilometres (110 mi) south-east of JakartaIndonesia), resulting in the failure of all four engines. The reason for the failure was not immediately apparent to the crew or ground control. The aircraft was diverted to Jakarta in the hope that enough engines could be restarted to allow it to land there. The aircraft was able to glide far enough to exit the ash cloud, and all engines were restarted (although one failed again soon after), allowing the aircraft to land safely at the Halim Perdanakusuma Airport in Jakarta.

The crew members of the incident segment had boarded the aircraft in Kuala Lumpur, while many of the passengers had been aboard since the flight began in London.[2]

Incident

Shortly after 13:40 UTC (20:40 Jakarta time) above the Indian Ocean, south of Java, the flight crew (consisting of Senior First Officer Roger Greaves and Senior Engineer Officer Barry Townley-Freeman while Captain Eric Moody was in the lavatory) first noted an effect on the windscreen similar to St Elmo’s fire.[1] The phenomenon persisted after Moody returned from the lavatory. Despite the weather radar showing clear skies, the crew switched on engine anti-ice and the passenger seat belt signs as a precaution.

As the flight progressed, smoke began to accumulate in the passenger cabin of the aircraft; it was first assumed to be cigarette smoke. However, it soon began to grow thicker and had an ominous odour of sulphur. Passengers who had a view out the aircraft windows noted that the engines were unusually bright, with light shining forward through the fan blades and producing a stroboscopic effect.[3]

At approximately 13:42 UTC (20:42 Jakarta time), engine number four began surging and soon flamed out. The flight crew immediately performed the engine shutdown drill, quickly cutting off fuel supply and arming the fire extinguishers. Less than a minute later, at 13:43 UTC (20:43 Jakarta time), engine two surged and flamed out. Within seconds, and almost simultaneously, engines one and three flamed out, prompting the flight engineer to exclaim, “I don’t believe it—all four engines have failed!”[3]

Without engine thrust, a 747-200 has a glide ratio of approximately 15:1, meaning it can glide forward 15 kilometres for every kilometre it drops. The flight crew quickly determined that the aircraft was capable of gliding for 23 minutes and covering 91 nautical miles (169 km) from its flight level of 37,000 feet (11,000 m).[3] At 13:44 UTC (20:44 Jakarta time), Greaves declared an emergency to the local air traffic control authority, stating that all four engines had failed. However, Jakarta Area Control misunderstood the message, interpreting the call as meaning that only engine number four had shut down. It was only after a nearby Garuda Indonesia flight relayed the message to Air Traffic Control that it was correctly understood. Despite the crew “squawking” the emergency transponder setting of 7700, the aeroplane could not be located by Air Traffic Control on their radar screens.

Many passengers, fearing for their lives, wrote notes to relatives. One such passenger was Charles Capewell, who scrawled “Ma. In trouble. Plane going down. Will do best for boys. We love you. Sorry. Pa XXX” on the cover of his ticket wallet.[2]

Owing to the high Indonesian mountains on the south coast of the island of Java, an altitude of at least 11,500 feet (3,500 m) was required to cross the coast safely. The crew decided that if the aircraft was unable to maintain altitude by the time they reached 12,000 feet (3,700 m) they would turn back out to sea and attempt to ditch into the Indian Ocean. The crew began engine restart drills, despite being well above the recommended maximum engine in-flight start envelope altitude of 28,000 feet (8,500 m). The restart attempts failed.

Despite the lack of time, Moody made an announcement to the passengers that has been described as “a masterpiece of understatement“:[3]

Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem. All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them going again. I trust you are not in too much distress.[3][4][5]

As pressure within the cabin fell, oxygen masks dropped from the ceiling — an automatic emergency measure to make up for the lack of air. On the flight deck, however, Greaves’s mask was broken; the delivery tube had detached from the rest of the mask. Moody swiftly decided to descend at 1,800 m per minute to an altitude where there was enough pressure in the outside atmosphere to breathe almost normally.

At 13,500 feet (4,100 m), the crew was approaching the altitude at which they would have to turn over the ocean and attempt a risky ditching. Although there were guidelines for the water landing procedure, no one had ever tried it in a Boeing 747, nor has anyone since. As they performed the engine restart procedure, engine number four finally started, and at 13:56 UTC (20:56 Jakarta time), Moody used its power to reduce the rate of descent. Shortly thereafter, engine three restarted, allowing him to climb slowly. Shortly after that, engines one and two successfully restarted as well.[6] The crew subsequently requested and expedited an increase in altitude in order to clear the high mountains of Indonesia.[7]

As the aircraft approached its target altitude, the St Elmo’s fire effect on the windscreen returned. Moody throttled back; however, engine number two surged again and was shut down. The crew immediately descended and held 12,000 feet (3,700 m).

As Flight 9 approached Jakarta, the crew found it difficult to see anything through the windscreen, and made the approach almost entirely on instruments, despite reports of good visibility. The crew decided to fly the ILS (Instrument Landing System); however, the glide slope (vertical guidance) system was inoperative, so they were forced to fly with only the localizer (lateral guidance) as the first officer monitored the airport’s DME (Distance Measuring Equipment). He then called out how high they should be at each DME step along the final approach to the runway, creating a virtual glide slope for them to follow. It was, in Moody’s words, “a bit like negotiating one’s way up a badger‘s arse.”[1] Although the runway lights could be made out through a small strip of the windscreen, the landing lights on the aircraft seemed to be inoperable. After landing, the flight crew found it impossible to taxi, due to glare from apron floodlights which made the already sandblasted windscreen opaque.

Aftermath

Damaged engine parts from BA 9 on display at Auckland Museum

Post-flight investigation revealed that City of Edinburgh’s problems had been caused by flying through a cloud of volcanic ash from the eruption of Mount Galunggung. Because the ash cloud was dry, it did not appear on the weather radar, which was designed to detect the moisture in clouds. The cloud sandblasted the windscreen and landing light covers and clogged the engines. As the ash entered the engines, it melted in the combustion chambers and adhered to the inside of the power-plant. As the engine cooled from inactivity, and as the aircraft descended out of the ash cloud, the molten ash solidified and enough broke off for air to again flow smoothly through the engine, allowing a successful restart. The engines had enough electrical power to restart because one generator and the onboard batteries were still operating; electrical power was required for ignition of the engines.

Engines one, two and three were replaced at Jakarta, as well as the windscreen, and the fuel tanks were cleared of the ash that had entered them through the pressurisation ducts, contaminating the fuel and requiring that it be disposed of. After being ferried back to London, engine number four was replaced and major work was undertaken to return the aircraft to service.

Although the airspace around Mount Galunggung was closed temporarily after the incident, it was reopened days later. It was only after a Singapore Airlines 747 was forced to shut down three of its engines while flying through the same area nineteen days later (13 July) that Indonesian authorities closed the airspace permanently and rerouted airways to avoid the area; a watch was set up to monitor clouds of ash.[3] Flight 9 was not the first encounter with this eruption — a Garuda DC-9 had encountered ash on 5 April 1982.[8]

The crew received various awards, including the Queen’s Commendation for Valuable Service in the Air and medals from the British Air Line Pilots Association. Following the incident, the crew and passengers formed the Galunggung Gliding Club as a means to keep in contact.[9] G-BDXH’s engineless flight entered the Guinness Book of Records as the longest glide in a non-purpose-built aircraft.

One of the passengers, Betty Tootell, wrote a book about the incident, All Four Engines Have Failed. She managed to trace some 200 of the 247 passengers on the flight, and went on to marry a fellow survivor, James Ferguson, who had been seated in the row in front of her. She notes: “The 28th December 2006 marks the start of our 14th year of honeymoon, and on the 24th June 2007 many passengers and crew will no doubt gather to celebrate the 25th anniversary of our mid-air adventure.”[10]

British Airways continued to operate the Flight 9 route from London Heathrow to Sydney; in March 2012 the route was curtailed to BangkokCity of Edinburgh, later renamed City of Elgin, continued to fly for British Airways after the incident, before being sold to European Aviation Air Charter. The aircraft was taken out of service in February 2004; in 2009, the then 30-year-old aircraft was scrapped. In September 2009 the environmental group 10:10 bought the fuselage of City Of Edinburgh to be made into tags. The tags, bearing the campaign’s logo, were worn as necklaces or bracelets and used to raise awareness of 10:10’s work: the organisation aimed to persuade individuals, organizations and businesses to reduce their carbon emissions by 10% in 2010.[11]

The incident featured in an episode of the Mayday documentary TV series Air Crash Investigation titled “Falling From the Sky”. This episode was repeated a number of times when the Eyjafjallajökull volcano caused a large-scale shutdown of European airspace.

Captain Eric Moody gave an interview to the July 2010 edition of Flaps Podcast, where he recounted his experience.

Similar incident

A nearly identical incident occurred on 15 December 1989 when KLM Flight 867, a Boeing 747-400 from Amsterdam to Anchorage, Alaska, flew into the plume of the erupting Mount Redoubt, causing all four engines to fail due to compressor stall. Once the flight cleared the ash cloud, the crew was able to restart each engine and then make a safe landing at Anchorage.[12]

source:::::business insider.com

Natarajan

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/captain-announcement-after-all-four-engines-failed-2013-2#ixzz2LvBynqiv

You Can’t Get Closer To The Belly Of A Flying Plane Than At Maho Beach !!!!

Vacationers usually travel to Caribbean beaches for the clear water and smooth sand, but some travelers venture to Maho Beach, St. Maarten for a different experience.Instead of snapping photos of sunsets and sunbathers, beachgoers at Maho take pictures of the incredibly low-flying planes as they land at Princess Julianna International Airport, just meters from the beach itself.

Some people even push the limits to see how much of a jet engine’s wind gusts they can withstand.

Check out the photos to see what it is like for yourself.

It is a spectacle that will keep luring vacationers to Maho Beach for years to come.

The viral videos have even caused the local government to consider taking increased safety measures to help prevent injuries.

The wind gusts are powerful enough to blow people over.

Maho Beach St. Maarten

But getting such a view comes with a warning.

source::::business insider .com

Natarajan

Atlanta…Busiest Airport in The World …..

One might expect the world’s busiest airport to be located in New York or London or Beijing, but the distinction actually belongs to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, located in the southern US city of Atlanta, Georgia. No matter which way you calculate it, Hartsfield-Jackson has been the world’s busiest since 1998. Not only does it attract more travellers than any other airport in the world (with about 92.4 million passengers passing through in 2011, the last full year on record), it also manages more aircraft movements (that is, more takeoffs and landings) than any airport in the world – with about950,000 in 2010, also the last year on record.

All of this begs the question, why is Atlanta the busiest hub for air travel in the world?

The Delta factor
Atlanta is home to one of the world’s largest airlines. Delta Air Lines was founded in the city of Macon, Georgia (originally as a crop-dusting company called Huff Daland Dusters) and later moved its headquarters about 85 miles north to Atlanta in 1941 (after running its first passenger flights under the name Delta Air Service in 1929).

Until 2012, Delta held the record for most annual traffic – measured by “revenue passenger miles” (RPM) – of any airline in the world. The metric of RPMs takes into account both the number of passengers carried and the distances an airline flew during a given year. In 2012 though, Delta’s RPM was beaten by United Airlines, which had grown in size following the 2010 merger between United and Continental Airlines.

So it makes sense, then, that Chicago, home to United’s headquarters, hosts the world’s second busiest airport as measured by aircraft movements – with 882,627 in 2010 – and the world’s fourth busiest as measured by sheer passenger numbers – with 66.6 million passengers in 2011. (The second and third busiest by number of passengers in 2011 are Beijing Capital International Airport, with 77.4 million and London Heathrow Airport with 69.4 million)

Hartsfield-Jackson serves 225 destinations in 51 countries, receives more than 250,000 passengers a day, and sees nearly 2,500 arrivals and departures per day. Out of this, Delta runs about 1,000 flights daily, serving more than 200 destinations.

The location
According to data collected by Hartsfield-Jackson Airport, Atlanta is located within a two-hour flight of 80% of the US population, making the city a major port of entry into the US and a logical stopover for travel within the expansive country.

Hartsfield-Jackson is also the only airport located in Atlanta and by far the biggest airport in Georgia. Most other major hub cities, such as New York, split traffic between two or more major airports. The nearest major airport to Hartsfield-Jackson, is 250 miles northwest, in Nashville, Tennessee.

The city
Hartsfield-Jackson also happens to be located in a city that attracts its fair share of travellers. Atlanta has been ranked the seventh most visited city for business travel in the US – unsurprising, since it is home to the headquarters of 10 Fortune 500 companies, including Coca-Cola, Home Depot (a massive home improvement retailer), UPS (the United Parcel Service) and, of course, Delta Air Lines.

For non-business visitors, Atlanta is also home to perhaps the world’s largest aquarium, where visitors can find the biggest fish on Earth. Rivalled only by the new SEA Aquarium in Singapore (which also calls itself the world’s largest), the Georgia Aquarium holds more than 8 million gallons of water and provides habitat to around 120,000 animals, according to aquarium statistics.

Atlanta’s big companies also offer behind-the-scenes tours popular with all kinds of travellers. Coca Cola offers an attraction called The World of Coca-Cola, a sort of museum taking tourists into the history of one of the planet’s most consumed beverages. CNN, the 24-hour cable news channel available around the world, has a popular Inside CNN Studio Tour.

If you find yourself enduring the all-too-common layover in Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, Jaunted offers five ideas for passing the time – including renting out a room at the airport’s unique Minute Suites, which let you rent out a private room by the hour or for the night in Terminal B, and dining at the upscale “southernnational” joint One Flew South, a restaurant in Terminal E incorporating southern ingredients and techniques to international cuisine fit for the typical Hartsfield traveller.

source:::::BBC.COM.TRAVEL

Natarajan

Air Travel Myths and Mysteries….

Myths and mysteries of an Air Travel…

From the safest seat on a plane to why some airlines don’t include row 13 and what really happens to your waste, we reveal the truth about air travel, with some help from flight deal website Skyscanner.com.

Is it safe to drink the water on planes?

Some planes have unwanted stowaways in their water supply, including bacteria that could make you sick, according to tests by the US Environmental Protection Agency in 2009. The water didn’t meet safety standards in one out of every seven planes tested, with bacteria associated with human faeces like coliform and E. coli found. Bacteria can grow in the plane’s water tanks and hoses, as the water is pumped on board through hoses that are difficult to clean. Best to be cautious on this!

Do you really get drunk quicker while in the skies?

Not true, according to studies. Dr. Bhushan Kapur from the University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine said passengers’ blood alcohol level doesn’t increase in the air. However, people do tend to drink more in a shorter time frame in the skies, which can leave them more impaired. So where does the misconception come from? The onboard effects of hypoxia – less oxygenated conditions due to the low-pressure environment and high altitude – can cause passengers to experience symptoms similar to intoxication.

What happens to your waste?

Airlines are not allowed to dump their waste tanks in mid-flight, however leaks can occur. Numerous “blue ice” (frozen sewage material treated by a liquid disinfectant that freezes at high altitude) impacts have been recorded, including some where it has fallen through the roofs of people’s homes.
For example, one UK couple were reportedly sitting in their garden when blue ice hit the roof of their house before landing on their heads. It gave off a “particularly pungent whiff of urine” as if thawed.

Do flight attendants have to be a certain weight?

There are no strict rules according to waistlines, but cabin crew must have “weight in proportion to height”. They must be able to sit in the jump seat without an extended seat belt and fit through the emergency exit window. The acceptable height is approximately 160-185 centimetres.

What happens when the pilot goes to the toilet?

Ever wondered why the seatbelt sign randomly lights up during a flight? Well forget turbulence, it may be that the pilot has made a sneaky trip to the toilet. A cabin crew member will guard the flight deck door while the pilot makes the trip to the lavatory.

Can lightning cause a plane crash?

Passenger planes are inevitable targets for lightning, which strikes a commercial plane on average once a year. However, lightning hasn’t downed a passenger plane since 1967. Planes have to pass numerous lightning certification tests. The outer skin of most planes is mainly aluminium – a good conductor of electricity. The current flows through the skin from the point of impact to another extremity point, commonly the tail.

Why do airlines leave out row 13?

Some airlines remove row 13 from their planes so not to spook superstitious flyers, including Air France, Emirates, Continental Airlines, Lufthansa and Ryanair. Lufthansa also flies minus a 17th row as it’s regarded as unlucky in Italy and Brazil.

Do lavatories have to be fitted with an ashtray, despite ban on smoking?

Smoking on planes has been banned for nearly 15 years, but all planes worldwide must have ashtrays to ensure flight safety. Why? A discarded cigarette sparked a plane crash in 1973, so the rule was adopted in case a passenger gave in to their cravings on a flight.

Can you get high from the emergency masks?

Contrary to what Brad Pitt’s character in Fight Club may think, the oxygen from the emergency masks won’t get you high. It’s actually a loss of oxygen that makes you feel this way, so that’s why airlines provide the masks in case the cabin pressure suddenly drops.

Can your mobile phone cause a plane crash?

The jury’s still out on this issue, but airlines are erring on the side of caution. Current regulations give crew the power to ban the use of any device that could threaten the safety of an aircraft. Experts say that electromagnetic waves emitted by mobiles can interfere with a plane’s electronics and cause a crash, concerns that were outlined in an investigation by the New York Times last year.

Which seats are the safest?

It’s true – the safest seat should you be involved in a mid-air disaster is the emergency exit, according to researchers from the University of Greenwich commissioned by the US Civil Aviation Authority, who looked at the accounts of 2000 survivors in 105 air accidents around the world. A seat up to five rows from an exit offers a greater chance of escaping if there’s a fire. There’s only a “marginal” difference as to whether the seat is on the aisle or not. It also found passengers at the front of the plane had a 65 per cent chance of escape, while those at the rear had only a 53 per cent chance.

Why does food taste different on a plane?

It’s not just your imagination – food really does taste different in the skies. Firstly, the atmosphere inside the cabin dries out the nose and then the change in air pressure numbs approximately a third of the taste buds. This explains why airlines tend to add a lot of salt and spice to food.

source::::news.com.au
Natarajan

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/travel/news/greatest-air-travel-myths-exposed/story-e6frfq80-1226463922963#ixzz2LE9jLXei

Take Off in the Miniature Airport !!!

Miniature airport           This is unbelievable !!!!
 
 
This must have required as much planning as the real thing.  
 
Amazing. I love the take offs!
 
 
It is hard to believe that all these Aircraft operations are ‘dummy” ….It is so realistic that you feel as if you are
sitting in control tower and watching aircraft movements and vehicle movements  on the dotted lines!!!!
Natarajan
source::::input from a friend of mine…

” Strange ” Plane at Melbourne Airport !!!!

 

The new 'plane' at Melbourne Airport is the centrepiece of a state-of-the-art training facility dubbed the Learning Academy Hot Fire Training Ground.The new ‘plane’ at Melbourne Airport is the centrepiece of a state-of-the-art training facility dubbed the Learning Academy Hot Fire Training Ground.

If you’ve visited Melbourne Airport in the past few months and wondered why an enormous, rust-coloured plane is sitting outside on the tarmac, wonder no more.

It’s not an art installation. It’s a full-sized mock-up aircraft fuselage that from mid-March will be laid with gaslines and set alight – like a giant barbecue – for use in aviation rescue and fire fighting (ARFF) training.

The structure – which is the centrepiece of a state-of-the-art training facility dubbed the Learning Academy Hot Fire Training Ground – will be quite the spectacle when alight and probably quite disturbing for those unaware that it isn’t an actual plane. A spokesman for Airservices Australia, however (the government-owned corporation that provides ARFF services at 21 of Australia’s airports), said passengers “shouldn’t be alarmed by smoke or flames from the training facility.”

Although this isn't the first aircraft mock-up that's been used for training purposes in Australia, Airservices said it's certainly the largest in the southern hemisphere, and possibly the world.Although this isn’t the first aircraft mock-up that’s been used for training purposes in Australia, Airservices said it’s certainly the largest in the southern hemisphere, and possibly the world.

“Airservices will take into account fire bans and existing wind conditions during the testing of the hot-fire training facility,” he said.

Advertisement

Although this isn’t the first aircraft mock-up that’s been used for training purposes in Australia, Airservices said it’s certainly the largest in the southern hemisphere, and possibly the world. At over 56 metres long, 10 metres high and 29 metres wide, it’s almost three times the length of existing aircraft mock-ups currently in use in Australia.

The structure is basically a mash-up of replicated sections of aircraft including the Airbus A380, Boeing 767 and DC10 aircraft, to train crews in fighting fires on different types of aircrafts and to allow multiple training scenarios to happen at the same time. It is the first time Airservices has developed a mock-up that includes the A380.

“This facility now gives us the ability to train firefighters in responding to the largest aircraft that will land in Australian airports,” the Airservices Australia spokesman said.

Depending on training requirements, the aircraft mock-up can also be lit at different levels, creating wheel fires, engine fires or complete aircraft fuselage fires. The centre of the aircraft will also have drums filled with fuel to replicate fires inside a plane.

Although it won’t be used to train cabin crew as it isn’t equipped with escape slides, the interior is set up like a real aircraft, complete with seating and overhead compartments.

Unfortunately for those who have been admiring the rustic burnt orange hue of the structure as they fly into Melbourne Airport, the plane will be turning black once it starts burning.

source:::::brisbane times.com

Natarajan

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/travel/travel-news/firing-up-strange-plane-appears-at-melbourne-airport-20130204-2dtsf.html#ixzz2Jwp4bXBE

A Blow at 30000 ft. Saves a Doctor at Flight !!!!!!

source::::TIMES OF INDIA..chennai…
Natarajan

A 46-year-old surgeon got a fresh lease of life, literally, on board a Kolkata-Chennai flight that was cruising at 30,000 feet on Saturday night. He fell unconscious and lost all pulse but was revived miraculously after a doctor who was on board gave a strong blow to the rib cage close to the heart. He sat up as if woken up from a deep slumber.

About 30 minutes after the IndiGo flight took off from Kolkata, the passenger fell unconscious. Thankfully, the flight had around half a dozen doctors returning to Chennai after an annual conference. Dr J S Rajkumar, chairman of Lifeline Hospitals, who was one of the first to rush to his help, said it was a shocking experience which taught several others a valuable lesson about the importance of Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR).

“Assessing him rapidly, we saw to our horror that he had no pulse, even in his neck, and was ice cold and unresponsive. He was dead for all practical purposes,” said Dr Raj Kumar. “I have never felt such cold skin in my life. I gave a strong pericardial thump (a strong blow to the rib cage in front of the heart) and he jumped back to life! His pulse and blood pressure returned to normal,” he said. The revived passenger is a surgeon at Vijaya Hospital.

The doctors had told the crew that the plane would have to land in Bhubaneswar if the passenger’s condition didn’t improve. But once he was revived, the doctors told them he was doing fine and there was no need to make the unscheduled landing. “He did not know what happened to him when he was without pulse for less than four minutes. It is a heart condition and needed monitoring for 24 hours. We sat beside him throughout the flight,” said Raj Kumar. The passenger was driven to Vijaya Hospital for further monitoring as soon as the flight landed in Chennai.

A Palace In the Sky !!!!!

Earlier this year, Dealbook revealed that billionaire Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal al-Saud was spending some $500 million on a fully customized A380 from Airbus, the most expensive private jet ever.
Now The Daily Mail has found out some jaw-dropping details about the plane, which the prince ordered more than three years ago.
Remember — the A380 is normally used as a commercial airliner, and can hold 800 passengers. But here’s what Prince Alwaleed has reportedly tricked out the triple-decker jet with instead:
A parking spot for his Rolls-Royce
Five suites with king-sized beds and ensuite bathrooms with showers
First-class “sleepers” for an additional 20 guests
A steam room for spa treatments and a marble-finished Turkish bath
A boardroom with holographic displays
A prayer area “in which computer-generated mats move to point towards Mecca”
A “concert hall” with a baby grand piano and seating for 10
A spiral staircase connecting all three floors
The average price for an A380 is $389 million, according to Airbus. But the prince’s plane, with its lavish customizations, is expected to cost upwards of $500 million.
He’s expected to take delivery of the plane in 2013.
Prince Alwaleed is worth an estimated $18 Billion.

source::::businessinsider.com
Natarajan
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/prince-alwaleeds-tricked-out-a380-jet-2012-12#ixzz2FsvWrgzy

Supersonic Airtravel Set to Come Back !!!

Nine years after the Concorde’s last flight, supersonic air travel is moving closer to a comeback. 

Supersonic flight, a longtime dream for makers and owners of private planes, is inching closer to reality.

Nine years after the last trip of the Concorde jetliner, the quest for speed without window-rattling sonic booms is spurring research by billionaire Robert Bass, General Dynamics’s Gulfstream, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and others.

The efforts signal that the time may finally be nearing for corporate aircraft flying faster than sound, about 1207 kilometres per hour at sea level. Technological leaps since the Concorde’s development in the 1960s are converging with the willingness of globe-trotting chief executive officers to pay more for ever-bigger and longer-range jets.

Some of the largest corporate planes, such as the Gulfstream G650, can flight about 90 per cent as fast as sound.Some of the largest corporate planes, such as the Gulfstream G650, can fly about 90 per cent as fast as sound.

“Most all of the manufacturers have done size, have done luxury and opulence,” said Andrew Hoy, a managing director at broker ExecuJet Aviation Group in Zurich. “Time is the biggest opportunity for them all and the only differentiator left.”

Advertisement

High operating costs and scant demand for the Concorde’s premium fares forced its retirement in 2003 after 27 years in service. The 100-seat jets streaked from New York to London at twice the speed of sound, slicing travel times in half to about three hours.

Planemakers took away a lesson in supersonic economics: It may be easier to find CEOs and wealthy individuals who crave faster corporate aircraft than to persuade airlines to invest in a Concorde successor.

‘More sense’

“Given the amount of fuel you need to burn to achieve supersonic speeds, it’s going to be a more expensive proposition that only a sliver of the market is going to pay the price for,” said George Hamlin, president of Hamlin Transportation Consulting in Fairfax, Virginia. “When you’re talking about a supersonic business jet, that begins to make more sense.”

The largest corporate planes already cost almost as much as the smallest Boeing and Airbus airliners, and can fly about 90 per cent as fast as sound. Gulfstream’s G650 lists for $US58.5 million ($A56 million). Bombardier’s Global 7000 and 8000 jets retail for as much as $US65 million. Warren Buffett’s NetJets unit ordered 20 last year.

The chief obstacle to supersonic flight is the same one that bedeviled the Concorde: the sonic boom. The US Federal Aviation Administration outlawed such flights by civilians over land in 1973 because of the noise, and other countries followed.

Boom rules

Reversing that ban will be pivotal to any revival of supersonic travel, because the planes would lose their business case if they can’t fly at top speed, according to Savannah, Georgia-based Gulfstream.

“That requires a solution to the sonic boom problem, and that’s where our research efforts are focused,” Preston Henne, Gulfstream’s senior vice president of engineering and test, said during an aviation conference in Orlando, Florida, in October. “We continue to make progress on that.”

NASA expects to start building a demonstrator plane in 2016 to show that disruptive booms can be minimized, and that jet may fly after 2020, according to Peter Coen, chief of supersonic research. In an industry in which Boeing’s Dreamliner took more than a decade to go from the Sonic Cruiser concept to first delivery, that’s not a long-range timeline.

“This is a high-value niche market; the winner here will be the first to market,” said Brian Foley, an aviation consultant based in Sparta, New Jersey. “That’s why there’s interest and that’s why there’s motivation for these people to keep on trying.”

Risks ahead

Success for a new generation of planes is hardly assured, said Foley, who spent 20 years as marketing director at Dassault Aviation’s Falcon business-jet unit.

No follow-on aircraft has emerged since Air France and British Airways parked their Concordes, which were grounded for more than a year after the 2000 crash in Paris that killed 113 people when one of the Air France jets struck runway debris.

The planes slurped twice as much fuel as a Boeing 747 jumbo jet with only about a quarter of the passengers, and round-trip tickets in 2003 fetched as much as $US13,500, then the sticker price on a Dodge Neon compact.

While new designs and engines may tame the roar billowing from a supersonic jet in flight, engineers still must muffle the so-called focused boom, the sharp crack that occurs as a plane first goes past the sound barrier. Emissions and maintenance on high-performance engines also remain challenges.

‘Magic number’

“It doesn’t matter which manufacturer is working on it at the time, when you ask them when it’s going to be a reality, they generally all say, ‘Within 12 years,’” Foley said. “That seems to be the magic number. It doesn’t matter if someone asks them in 1980, 1990 or 2000, there will be one within 12 years.”

Supersonic-flight boosters such as NASA’s Coen see reason for optimism. Planemakers can employ more-powerful engines, use new materials such as the lightweight composites on Boeing’s Dreamliner and draw on years of aeronautical knowledge from the Concorde’s operations and from making supersonic warplanes.

Gulfstream is experimenting with a telescoping rod protruding from a jet’s nose to disrupt the sound waves that cause sonic booms. Bass, a co-founder of investment firm Oak Hill Capital Partners LP, has hired a NASA research jet to test a high-speed wing design from his Aerion Corp.

Boeing and Lockheed have devised supersonic concepts with slender fuselages and rear-mounted engines to damp drag that contributes to the noise. NASA is testing models as long as 3 feet (0.9 meter) in wind tunnels and studying nozzles from General Electric Co. and Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc for future engines, Coen said.

‘Pretty close’

“We were able to achieve both good aerodynamic elements and low sonic boom simultaneously,” Coen said. “We think we’re there or pretty close. That was a really exciting development over the past year.”

After holding public meetings on supersonic flight from 2008 through 2011, the FAA is shifting to gather data from NASA and industry groups as it weighs noise regulations.

“Current research has demonstrated enough progress on reducing impact of sonic booms before they reach the ground for us to revisit this issue,” the FAA said in an e-mailed response to questions. No new public sessions are scheduled.

Bass’s Aerion doesn’t want to wait for any regulatory changes. The Reno, Nevada-based company has a low-drag wing design that it says will allow a jet to fly efficiently at subsonic speed over land and at as much as Mach 1.6, or 1.6 times the speed of sound, over the ocean.

Aerion was in “deep discussions” on a planemaker partner to build the craft as the recession began in late 2007, Chief Operating Officer Douglas Nichols said. Before the economy tanked, Aerion had 50 commitments for an $80 million supersonic plane, Nichols said. Bass declined to comment on Aerion through a spokeswoman, Marcia Horowitz.

“We have a thoroughly committed and patient investor who believes these things and is heavily involved in the business,” Nichols said. “The next frontier is speed and the industry will get there sooner or later. Our wish is sooner.”

source::::brisbane times.com

natarajan

Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/travel/holiday-type/business/supersonic-air-travel-set-for-comeback-20121128-2adra.html#ixzz2DZs9WUPW