|
“When the Lord takes on the deluding human form, He moves with us, mixes and dines with us, behaves as our very own kinsman, well-wisher, friend, and guide; and also saves us from many a calamity that threatened to overwhelm us. He showered divine mercy on us and solved the toughest problems that defied solution, in remarkably simple ways. When He was near and dear to us, we were carried away by pride that we had His grace and did not try to fill ourselves with that supreme joy, to dive deep into the flood of His grace. We sought from Him mere external victory and temporal benefits, ignoring the vast treasure that could have filled our hearts. We never contemplated on His reality. We might be born many times over, but can we ever have such a friend and kinsman again?”, remarked Arjuna recounting the time he spent with Krishna.
|
discipline
Origin of the Word ” Couch Potato …” !!!
The Interesting Origin of “Couch Potato”
If you want to call someone lazy, a time-honoured way to do so would be to call them a “couch potato”. But why is it we compare lazy people to potatoes and why on Earth did some random guy own the trademark rights to such a silly sounding expression?
Unlike most etymologies, we actually know theexact date that the phrase in question was first written down for mass public consumption as well as the exact date it was first spoken out loud. In regards to the former, the first time the phrase appeared in print was 1979 in an LA Timesarticle where it said, “…and the Couch Potatoes who will be lying on couches watching television as they are towed toward the parade route.” In regards to the latter, according to the man who coined the phrase, he first uttered it during a phone call on July 15, 1976.
More specifically, the man who breathed the phrase into existence is Tom Lacino. He stated he coined the phrase during “a phone call to a friend. His girlfriend answered, and it was just an off-the-top sort of thing when I said, ‘Hey, is the couch potato there?’ She looked over and there he was on the couch, and she started cracking up.”
Although Lacino claims that there was no real thought behind the phrase, other than that he thought it was a pretty funny way to describe his friend, linguists have noted that the phrase is actually a rather clever play on words. To explain, during the 1970s a popular term for the television was, “the boob tube” which was coined by people who believed watching television was a pursuit only enjoyed by the foolish. Since the edible part of a potato plant is known as a “tuber”, it is commonly believed that the phrase “couch potato” was intended as a clever combination of these two concepts. While that is an incredibly convincing and succinct explanation of the origins of the phrase and is repeated in many an etymological dictionary, we feel it is important to note again that when asked if there was any reason he called his friend a couch potato all those years ago, Lacino offered the verbal equivalent of a shrug in response. Of course, perhaps he simply forgot his reasoning. After all, it’s been nearly four decades since the momentous uttering.
While Lacino was perhaps not initially aware of the playful subtleties behind his utterance, his friend Robert Armstrong certainly was and after hearing the phrase repeated back to him by Tom, Armstrong asked Lacino for permission to turn it into a cartoon.
At the time this was taking place, both Lacino and Armstrong were members of a group calling themselves the “Boob Tubers” which was an orginization created in 1973 in humourous response to a growing health-craze movement in California at the time. In contrast to this movement, the main goal of the Boob Tubers was basically to sit in front of a television and eat junk food. While their goal was certainly a noble one, it didn’t really gain any traction until the phrase couch potato came along.
Armstrong, who was a cartoonist by trade, is the one credited with really pushing the phrase into mainstream lexicon when in 1979 under the new name of “The Couch Potatoes”, he, Tom and several others sailed a float in the Doo Dah Parade (an event meant to parody the more famous Tournament of Roses parade in Pasadena). The float, which literally consisted of nothing more than a few couches pointed at a couple of working TVs on which the group sat for the duration of the parade, was a huge hit and its subsequent media coverage resulted in the first known publicly written use of the term in the aforementioned 1979 LA Timesarticle.
Armstrong, inspired by the success, created a bunch of merchandise around the concept of a couch potato, even going so far as to publish a newsletter aptly called “The Tuber’s Voice: The Couch Potato’s Newsletter“.
Though Armstrong had the foresight to trademark the phrase in 1979, it was simply too popular. Despite his best efforts, the sheer ubiquity of the phrase in media and print meant that he could no longer claim exclusivity to it. As he found out when the New York Times‘ legal department responded to Armstrong’s legal team who stated, “Couch Potato is a registered trademark and not a generic term…”, attempting to get the Times to stop using it as such. The Times legal team responded,
“I am afraid that your letter overlooks the fundamental distinction between statements of fact and statements of opinion. Mr. Safire’s view concerning the wide acceptance of the term “Couch Potato” is clearly an expression of editorial opinion, and, as the Supreme Court has instructed, there is no such thing as a false opinion. Although you may disagree with this opinion, there is simply no basis for requesting a correction.”
Needless to say, neither the New York Times nor other media outlets were moved to stop using the term as a generic slang.
SOURCE:::: http://www.todayifoundout.com
Natarajan
Jan 21 2015
Cartoon of the Day… !!!
How Mumbai Once Lived !!!….
Mumbai may pace to a frenetic beat, but the metropolis has hidden corners where life moves more leisurely.
Satish Bodas/Rediff.com visits the city’s BDD chawls where neighbours live like one big family.
If you want to see what life was like a few decades ago, I’d suggest a visit to Mumbai’s 92-year-old Bombay Development Directorate’s chawls.
Families manage in tiny rooms and neighbours, unlike what happens in much of Mumbai, are very much a part of each other’s lives. The chawls’s residents still share their joys, sorrows and festivals with each other.
BDD is a little oasis in the heart of Mumbai — where a bustling lifestyle and tall skyscrapers pause to watch a slower, more measured Time that exists in a few old stone buildings.
But the residents — mainly Hindus and Buddhists — say it is time for change. Their families have expanded and living in such tiny spaces, plagued by leakage problems, is no longer easy.
Many youngsters have moved out; the older generation waits behind, hoping that redevelopment will take place, yet not completely ready to let go of a life they are so familiar with.
In my eyes, it is one of the last bastions guarding a simple, old-fashioned way of life.

The structures of the BDD chawls were built between 1922 and 1925.

When space is short, windows provide a convenient area for storage.

Kashinath Anna Kakade, who is 95 years old, has created a special calendar.
If you tell him the date of your birth, he will tell you on which day you were born.
He makes it a point to read the newspaper regularly and enjoys drinking a glass of milk every day.
Mr Kakade has been staying here since 1948 and feels that life today is much more comfortable than it was in his youth.
“Then,” he says, “we had to go down to fetch water, but now the BMC (Brihammumbai Municipal Corporation) water comes directly to my house.”

This old ladder leads to the terrace. Only one person can use it at a time.
As you can see, the ravages of age have begun to show in this old stone structure.

The families living here rely on gas cylinders and kerosene stoves to cook their daily meals.
As you can see, water continues to be a major issue. Look at all the vessels used to store the precious liquid.
Each room is home a family and is self-contained; it includes the bathroom and the kitchen.
The toilets, of course, are communal and are located outside the house.
Each floor houses 20 families in 20 rooms.
There are six toilets on each floor — three for men and three for women.

This family on the ground floor, like many others in the chawl, uses the extra space outside their house to wash and dry their clothes.
If you look at the photograph carefully, you will see the little door (behind the lady in maroon) they have made under the window for a quick entry and exit.

Sadly, the rear areas of the BDD buildings are used as chicken coops-cum-garbage dumps.

Facing the chawls is a huge open area where children skip out to play… a rarity in Mumbai.

Most of the residents, except those who stay in buildings reserved as residential quarters for the police (known locally as Police Line Buildings), have extended their rooms to get extra space.
Take a look at this picture and you’ll know what I mean.

You don’t need to live in fancy buildings to have a gymnasium on the premises. Here’s a look at the gym at BDD chawl.

Skyscrapers, with their alluring promise of a more modern lifestyle, tower nearby.

Every floor is connected through a long passage, with houses on both sides. These passage, as you can see, become an extension of the houses.

Finally, here’s a glimpse of how the old replaces the new — the old wooden staircase of the chawl has been renovated using tiles and marble.
Satish Bodas/Rediff.com








