” Why a $ is called a Buck …” !!!

Why a Dollar is Also Called a “Buck”!!!

As with many etymologies, the exact root of this word is difficult to say with one hundred percent certainty. However, the leading theory is extremely plausible and backed up by a fair bit of documented evidence. Specifically, it is thought that a dollar is called a “buck” thanks to deer.

One of the earliest references of this was in 1748, about 44 years before the first U.S. dollar was minted, where there is a reference to the exchange rate for a cask of whiskey traded to Native Americans being “5 bucks”, referring to deerskins. In yet another documented reference from 1748, Conrad Weiser, while traveling through present day Ohio, noted in his journal that someone had been “robbed of the value of 300 Bucks.”

At this time, a buck skin was a common medium of exchange. There is also evidence that a “buck” didn’t simply mean one deerskin, but may have meant multiple skins, depending on quality. For instance, skins from deer killed in the winter were considered superior to those killed in the summer, due to the fur being thicker.

It is thought that the highest quality skins were generally assigned a one to one value, with one skin equaling one buck. In contrast, for lower quality skins, it might take several of them to be valued at a single buck. The specific value for given sets of skins was then set at trading.

In addition, when the skin was from another animal, the number of skins required to equal a buck varied based on the animal and the quality of the skins. For instance, there is one documented trade where six high quality beaver skins or twelve high quality rabbit pelts each equaled one buck.

This use of skins as a medium of exchange gradually died off over the next century as more and more Europeans moved in and built towns and cities. Once the U.S. dollar was officially introduced after the passing of the Coinage Act of 1792, it quickly became the leading item used as a medium of exchange, but the term “buck” stuck around and by the mid-nineteenth century was being used as a slang term for the dollar.

If you liked this article, please consider purchasing The Wise Book of Whys, whence this article came. As mentioned, sales of this book go towards keeping ads out of this newsletter as much as possible. So if you hate ads as much as we do, please do consider purchasing a copy for yourself or as a gift for someone.  Thanks!

Bonus Fact:

  • While it may be tempting to think that the “buck” in this sense is where we also get the phrase “pass the buck”, most etymologists don’t think the two are related. The leading theory on the origin of the phrase “pass the buck” is thought to come from poker, with one of the earliest known references of the idea of literally passing a buck being found in the 1887 work by J.W. Keller, titled “Draw Poker”. In it, Keller states: “The ‘buck’ is any inanimate object, usually knife or pencil, which is thrown into a jack pot and temporarily taken by the winner of the pot. Whenever the deal reaches the holder of the ‘buck,’ a new jack pot must be made.” As to why it is then called  a buck, it is thought that may have arisen from the fact that buck-handled knives were once common, and knives were often used as the “buck” in this sense. As for the figurative sense of passing the buck, this didn’t start popping up until the early twentieth century.

 

SOURCE:::: http://www.today i found out.com

Natarajan

Strange … But True !!!

The U.S. Accidentally Dropped An Atomic Bomb On South Carolina In 1958 !!!

The Cold War is over, but there are still plenty of remnants from its troubles across the American landscape. One major reminder of this era is the crater in Mars Bluffs, South Carolina, where the Air Force accidentally dropped an atomic bomb in 1958. This site was one of the biggest military blunders of the entire Cold War. It’s a miracle that no one was killed.

Walter Gregg and his family were minding their own business on March 11, 1958. Suddenly, a giant explosion out of nowhere rocked the property and nearly destroyed their house. After Gregg accounted for his family members (none of whom were injured), he wondered what exactly happened.

Unbeknownst to Gregg, on that same spring morning, a B-47 Stratojet was flying in the skies over his property. The bomber was on its way to the U.K. to take part in a war game exercise. At that time, all bombers in the air were required to carry an atomic payload. This was because of the off-chance that nuclear war broke out while they were in the air. This particular bomber carried a Mark 6 atomic bomb, like the one pictured below.

Luckily, this particular Mark 6 bomb did not have its nuclear rod inserted. Otherwise, what happened would have been much, much worse.

As the bomber passed over Gregg’s house, a warning light went off. Something was wrong with the bomb’s docking system. Apparently, the locking pin was not engaged properly. That’s when navigator Captain Bruce Kulka went to investigate. However, while he was trying to fix the locking pin, Kulka accidentally pressed the bomb’s emergency release.

The weight of the 8,500 pound bomb forced the bay doors open. The bomb plummeted towards the woods of Mars Bluff. When the bomb landed, it left a 75-foot-wide, and 30-foot-deep crater in the forest near Gregg’s house. Here is what the impact site looks like today.

Luckily, no one died in the explosion, but it did level several buildings on Gregg’s property and damage nearby houses. Just imagine how much worse it would have been if the bomb was armed with its nuclear material.

The military paid Gregg and his family $54,000 to rebuild what was destroyed by the bomb and to keep things quiet. It was also around this time when a new rule was put in place requiring planes to make sure that their payloads were locked before take-off.

You can still see some pieces of the original bomb dropped on Mars Bluff at a local museum.

Via: Atlas Obscura

Talk about a big “oopsie.” I can’t believe the flight crew didn’t think to check if the bomb was secured properly before taking off. This could have kicked off World War III if the bomb was actually armed with its nuclear rod. What a simple mistake. Luckily, we’re all around now to laugh about it.

SOURCE::::www.viralnova.com
Natarajan

 

The First Website Ever Made !!!

Today I found out what the first website ever made was.  Simply put, it was a website made by the World Wide Web’s creator Tim Berners-Lee, who was working for CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

first ever webserver

The first ever website was published on August 6, 1991 and served up a page explaining the World Wide Web project and giving information on how users could setup a web server and how to create their own websites and web pages, as well as how they could search the web for information.  The URL for the first ever web page put up on the first ever website was http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/TheProject.html

This link is no longer active and, unfortunately, nobody bothered to make a copy of this original page, which tended to be updated daily anyways.  The earliest version of it that was recorded was in 1992 and a copy of that page can be found here.

The first ever web browser, called WorldWideWeb, was also created by Tim Berners-Lee.  This browser had a nice graphical user interface; allowed for multiple fonts and font sizes; allowed for downloading and displaying images, sounds, animations, movies, etc.; and had the ability to let users edit the web pages being viewed in order to promote collaboration of information.  However, this browser only ran on NeXT Step’s OS, which most people didn’t have because of the high cost of these systems (this company was owned by Steve Jobs, so you can imagine the cost bloat ;-)).

In order to provide a browser anyone could use, the next browser he developed was much simpler and, thus, versions of it could be quickly developed to be able to run on just about any computer, pretty much regardless of processing power or operating system.  It was a bare-bones inline browser (command line / text only), which didn’t have most of the features of his original browser, but at least could be used on pretty much any computer out there at the time and allowed people to access the information on the web.

The first web server was also written by Tim Berners-Lee called CERN HTTPd, the latter part standing for “Hypertext Transfer Protocol daemon”.   For those not familiar, a daemon is simply a program that more or less runs in the background on a system doing whatever it is programmed to do; in this case, listening for and responding to requests for web pages that exist on the machine it is running on; thus this daemon would be called a “server”.

SOURCE::: Daven Hiskey in  today i found out .com

Natarajan

‘பாரதி’ பிறந்த கதை !!!…. பாரதியார் பிறந்த நாள் …11th Dec …

பாரதி பிறந்தநாள் டிசம்பர்: 11

சுப்ரமணிய பாரதியின் அப்பா சின்னசாமி, அந்தக் காலத்திலேயே பருத்தி ஆலை வைச்சிருந்தாரு. எதிர்காலத்தில் தொழிற்பேட்டை ஒன்றை உருவாக்கும் கனவோட இருந்தாரு. மகன் வளர்ந்தவுடன் அந்தத் தொழிற்பேட்டையை கவனித்துக் கொள்வான்னு நினைச்சாரு.

சுப்ரமணியனோட அம்மா ஐந்து வயசுலேயே இறந்து போயிட்டாங்க. அதோட சுப்ரமணியனுக்குப் படிப்புல பெரிசா ஆர்வம் இல்ல. பள்ளிக்கூடம் முடிஞ்ச ஒடனே தோப்பு, தோட்டம்னு சுத்திப் பார்க்கக் கிளம்பிடுவாரு. அப்புறம் அடிக்கடி தாத்தாவோட வீட்டுக்கும் போவாரு. அவரோட தாத்தா இலக்கியம், பாட்டெல்லாம் வாசிச்சுக் காட்டுவாரு. சுப்ரமணியனுக்குத் தமிழ் இலக்கணமும், தமிழ்க் காப்பியங்களும் ரொம்பவும் பிடிச்சிருந்துச்சு.

மற்றொரு பக்கம் பாடத்தைப் படிக்காமல், வீட்டுப் பாடம் செய்யாம பள்ளிக்கூடம் போன சுப்ரமணியனுக்குத் தண்டனை வழங்கினாங்க. “எனக்கு என்ன பிடிக்கிதோ, அதை யாரும் சொல்லித் தர மாட்டாங்களா”ன்னு சுப்ரமணியன் ஏங்கினான்.

சீக்கிரத்திலேயே பார்வையற்ற ஒரு படிப்பாளியைக் கண்டுபிடிச்சு, அவர்கிட்ட கம்ப ராமாயணத்தைக் கத்துக்கிட்டான். அதுக்கப்புறம் சொந்தமாகவே சுப்ரமணியன் தமிழ் இலக்கணம் கத்துக்க ஆரம்பிச்சான்.

ஒரு நாள் சுப்ரமணியனோட நண்பன் ஒருவன் எட்டயபுரம் ராஜாவோட அரண்மனைக்கு அழைச்சுட்டுப் போனான். ஏதாவது ஒரு குறளின் முதல் வார்த்தையையோ அல்லது ஒரு வெண்பாவின் ஒரு பகுதியையோ சொன்னால், சுப்ரமணியன் உடனடியா எஞ்சிய அடிகளைச் சொன்னான். சுப்ரமணியன் நகைச்சுவையா பேசுறதையும் கவிதை சொல்றதையும் எட்டயபுரம் ராஜா ரசிச்சார்.

“இவன் ஒரு குழந்தை மேதை. பெரிய கவிஞன் ஆவதற்கான அறிவு, உங்க மகன்ட்ட இருக்கு”ன்னு சுப்ரமணியனோட அப்பாகிட்ட சொன்னார் எட்டயபுரம் ராஜா.

ஏற்கெனவே சுப்ரமணியன் செஞ்ச விஷயங்கள் பிடிக்காம இருந்த அவனோட அப்பா, தன் மகன் இப்படிக் கவிதையே கதின்னு இருந்துறக்கூடாதுன்னு நினைச்சாரு. அதனால திருநெல்வேலில ஒரு ஆங்கிலப் பள்ளிக்கு சுப்ரமணியனை படிக்க அனுப்பினார். அப்படிச் செஞ்சா எல்லாம் மாறிடும்னு அவர் நினைச்சாரு.

அங்கேயும் சுப்ரமணியனோட நகைச்சுவை உணர்வும், கவிதை எழுதுற திறனும் சக மாணவர்கள்கிட்ட பிரபலமாச்சு.

ஒரு நாள் வகுப்பறையில சுப்ரமணியன் கொஞ்சம் கண் அசந்துட்டான். சுப்ரமணியனை எழுப்பி, நடத்துன பாடத்தில இருந்து ஆசிரியர் கேள்வி கேட்டார். சுப்ரமணியனுக்கோ பதில் தெரியல. கோபமடைஞ்ச ஆசிரியர், “மேகம் மழையைப் பொழியறது போல, நீ கவிதை சொல்வேன்னு கேள்விப்பட்டேன். ஆனால், நான் கேட்ட கேள்விக்கு உன்கிட்ட பதிலே இல்லையே”ன்னு கேட்டாரு.

“மெத்தப் படித்த ஆசிரியரே, ஒரு விஷயத்தை நீங்க மறந்துட்டீங்க. மேகங்கள் மகிழ்ச்சியை வெளிப்படுத்தத்தான் மழை பொழிகின்றன. நீங்க கேள்வி கேட்கிறதால இல்ல”ன்னு பட்டென்னு பதில் சொன்னான் சுப்ரமணியன். ஆனா, இறுதிப் பரீட்சைல ஃபெயிலான அவன் ஊருக்குத் திரும்பினான்.

இதனால் வருத்தப்பட்ட அவனுடைய அப்பா, எட்டயபுரம் ராஜாவைப் பார்த்து அரசவை பணியில சுப்ரமணியனைச் சேர்த்துவிட்டார். ராஜாவோட நண்பர்கள் சிலருக்கு சுப்ரமணியனைப் பிடிக்கல. அவர்கள்ல ஒருத்தர், “நீங்க பெரிய புத்திசாலி போலத் தெரியுது. ஆனா, பரீட்சைல தோத்துப் போயிருக்கீங்களே” என்று மறைமுகமாகக் கிண்டல் செய்ய ஆரம்பிச்சாரு.

இதனால ரெண்டு பேருக்கும் இடையே வாக்குவாதம் ஏற்பட்டுச்சு. கல்வியைப் பற்றி ஒரு விவாதம் நடத்தலாம்னு முடிவாச்சு. முதல்ல எதிர்த் தரப்பு ஆள் பேசினார். அடுத்ததாகப் பேச ஆரம்பிச்ச சுப்ரமணியன், எல்லோரும் ஆச்சரியப்படுற மாதிரி அற்புதமாகப் பேசினார். அவருடைய வாதம் எதிராளியையும் வசப்படுத்துச்சு.

அந்த விவாதம் முடிஞ்சதும், ஒரு முதிர்ந்த பண்டிதர் எழுந்து சுப்ரமணியன்கிட்ட போனாரு. “நீ உன் வயசை மீறுன புத்திசாலித்தனத்தோட இருக்கிறாய். அதனால், நீ ஒரு பாரதி (அனைத்தும் அறிந்த பண்டிதர்)”ன்னு பட்டம் சூட்டினார்.

அதுக்கப்புறம் சுப்ரமணியனை, எல்லோரும் பாரதின்னே கூப்பிட ஆரம்பிச்சாங்க. உலகம் போற்றும் கவிஞரா மாறின அவர், சுப்ரமணிய பாரதியாராக ஜொலித்தார்.

SOURCE:::: http://www.tamil.the hindu.com
Natarajan

Nobel Prize Winning Indians… 1913 to 2014 !!!

Rabindranath Tagore was the only Indian Nobel literature laureate. In 1913, In his acceptance speech, he said, “I beg to convey to the Swedish Academy my grateful appreciation of the breadth of understanding which has brought the distant near, and has made a stranger a brother.”
Sir C.V. Raman won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1930 for his work in the field of light scattering. This effect is now named after him — the Raman scattering. In his speech, he said he was inspired by the “wonderful blue opalescence of the Mediterranean Sea”, during a voyage to Europe in 1921.
Hargobind Khorana (Far right) shared the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1968, with Marshall W. Nirenberg and Robert W. Holley by showing the the order of nucleotides in nucleic acids. In his speech, he thanked ” a very large number of devoted colleagues, chemists and biochemists” .
S. Chandrasekhar, along with William A. Fowler won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1983 for their mathematical theory of black holes. The Chandrasekhar limit is named after him. In his speech, he quoted Tagore’s Gitanjali and said, “May I, on behalf of my wife and myself, express our immense gratitude to the Nobel Foundation for this noble reception in this noble city?”
Again a first and only, Amartya Sen won The Prize in Economics in 1998. In his speech, which he began with a “silly thought”, he said, “economists too can learn from the kind of open minded reasoning employed by Tagore and Chandrasekhar”.
Mother Teresa won the Nobel Peace prize in 1979. In a lecture played on the day of the ceremony, she said, “We must give each other until it hurts. It is not enough for us to say: I love God, but I do not love my neighbour.”
Venkatraman Ramakrishnan won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2009, along with Thomas A. Steitz and Ada E. Yonath, “for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome”. In his speech, he thanked “the dedicated work and intellectual contributions of generations of talented postdocs, students and research assistants”.
Kailash Satyarthi who won the Nobel Peace Prize 2014 at his Bachpan Bachao Aandolan office soon after announcement of the prize, in New Delhi. An avid follower of Gandhian philosophy, he vowed that “the fight would continue”. Photo: V. Sudershan
SOURCE:::: http://www.the hindu.com
Natarajan

” All You Need to Know About Nobel Prizes…”

  • The 1936 Nobel Peace Prize

    The 1936 Nobel Peace Prize

From 1901 till this year, Nobel prizes have been awarded 567 times to 864 Laureates and 25 organisations with the youngest winner being Peace Prize awardee Malala Yousafzai of Pakistan at 17 years.

By winning the Peace Nobel at this tender age along with India’s Kailash Satyarthi, Ms. Yousafzai beat the previous record of Lawrence Bragg, who won the Physics Nobel in 1915 at the age of 25.

Kailash Satyarthi (left) and Malala Yousafzai

The word “Laureate” signifies the laurel wreath awarded to winners of athletic competitions and poetic meets in Ancient Greece. In Greek mythology, god Apollo is represented wearing on his head a laurel wreath, a circular crown made of branches and leaves of the bay laurel.

The statutes of the Nobel Foundation say, “If none of the works under consideration is found to be of the importance indicated in the first paragraph, the prize money shall be reserved until the following year.”

“If, even then, the prize cannot be awarded, the amount shall be added to the Foundation’s restricted funds.”

On 27 November 1895, Alfred Nobel signed his last will and testament, giving the largest share of his fortune to a series of prizes in Physics, Chemistry, Physiology or Medicine, Literature and Peace.

In 1968, Sweden’s central bank Sveriges Riksbank established The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in memory of Nobel.

At the Nobel Award ceremonies on December 10, the Laureates receive three things: a Nobel Diploma, a Nobel Medal and a document confirming the Nobel Prize amount.

Each Nobel Diploma is a unique work of art, created by foremost Swedish and Norwegian artists and calligraphers.

The Nobel Medals are handmade with careful precision and in 18 carat green gold plated with 24 carat gold.

The Nobel Prize amount for 2014 is set at Swedish kronor (SEK) 8.0 million per full Nobel Prize.

Interesting facts

The average age of all Nobel Laureates in all prize categories between 1901 and 2014 is 59 years.

Two most common birthdays among the Nobel Laureates are May 21 and February 28.

Since 1901, prizes have not been awarded 50 times, most of them during World War I (1914-1918) and II (1939-1945).

Leonid Hurwicz has the distinction of being the oldest Nobel recipient at the age of 90 for Economics in 2007.

Till now, 47 women have won the Nobel while two Laureates declined the prize.

Jean-Paul Sartre, awarded the 1964 Nobel Prize in Literature, declined it as he had consistently declined all official honours.

Jean-Paul Sartre

Le Duc Tho, awarded the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize jointly with U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger for negotiating the Vietnam peace accord, said he was not in a position to accept the award, citing the situation in Vietnam as his reason.

Four Laureates were forced by authorities to decline the Nobel.

Adolf Hitler forbade three Germans Richard Kuhn, Adolf Butenandt and Gerhard Domagk, from accepting the Nobel Prize.

They, however, received the Nobel Prize Diploma and Medal later but not the prize amount.

Boris Pasternak, the 1958 Nobel Laureate in Literature, initially accepted the Prize but was later coerced by authorities of his native country the Soviet Union to decline the award.

Three Peace Laureates — Germany’s Carl von Ossietzky, Myanmar’s pro-democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi and Chinese rights activist Liu Xiaobo — were under arrest at the time of the award.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) was given the Nobel Peace Prize thrice while its founder Henry Dunant won the first Peace Prize in 1901.

Linus Pauling has the distinction of being the only person to have been awarded two unshared Nobel Prizes — the 1954 Prize in Chemistry and the 1962 Peace Prize.

Why is Nobel Peace Prize given by Norway?

Since 1901, when Nobel Prizes were first given, Peace Prize has been awarded by a committee of five, appointed by the Norwegian Parliament Storting in accordance with Alfred Nobel’s will.

Alfred Nobel never disclosed why he didn’t give the task of awarding the Peace Prize to a Swedish body.

The reasons are speculative.

One argument is that Nobel admired Norwegian patriot and leading author Bjornstjerne Bjornson while another is that the Storting was the first national legislature to vote in support for the international peace movement.

Nobel may also have favoured distribution of the tasks related to the Nobel Prizes within the Swedish-Norwegian union or he may have feared that given the highly political nature of the Peace Prize, it might become a tool in power politics thus reducing its significance as an instrument for peace.

“It is my express wish that in awarding the prizes no consideration be given to the nationality of the candidates, but that the most worthy shall receive the prize, whether he be Scandinavian or not,” Nobel wrote in his will.

During the 20th century, eight Scandinavians have won the Peace Prize — five Swedes, two Norwegians and one Dane.

In the nomination and selection process, the committee has the assistance of a secretary and since the establishment of the Norwegian Nobel Institute in 1904, this person is also the institute’s director.

There have been several criticism and protests against decisions of the Norwegian Nobel Committee since 1901.

The selection process

The Peace Prize award ceremony on December 10 is the culmination of a long selection process.

According to rules, there can be a maximum of three Laureates in a category every year.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee begins the whole process by inviting nominations which can be submitted by February 1 each year.

Who are entitled to nominate candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize?

Present and past members of the Nobel Committee and advisers at the Nobel Institute; members of national assemblies and governments, and members of the Inter-Parliamentary Union; members of the Permanent Court of Arbitration and the International Court of Justice at the Hague and members of the Commission of the Permanent International Peace Bureau.

Besides them, members of the Institut de Droit International and present university professors of law, political science, history and philosophy; and holders of the Nobel Peace Prize can also nominate.

After reviewing their qualifications, a shortlist of the candidates is made.

The announcement of the Laureate’s name is often made on a Friday in mid-October at the Nobel Institute building and the award is presented annually on December 10, the day Alfred Nobel died in 1896.

SOURCE:::: http://www.the hindu.com

Natarajan

” The Accidental Discovery of Saccharin….”

sweeteners

Saccharin is noted as being the first artificial sweetener, outside of the toxic Lead(II) acetate, and the first product to offer a cheap alternative to cane sugar.  Interestingly enough, like the Chocolate Chip Cookie, it was also discovered entirely by accident.

The chemical was discovered in 1878/9 in a small lab at Johns Hopkins University. The lab belonged to professor of chemistry and all around chemical boffin, Ira Remsen. Remsen was hired by the H.W. Perot Import Firm in 1877, primarily so that the firm could loan the use of his lab to a young Russian chemist and sugar-nerd, Constantin Fahlberg.

The H.W. Perot company wanted Fahlberg to test the purity of a shipment of sugar they’d had impounded by the US government using Remsen’s lab. Fahlberg agreed and happily conducted the tests. After he’d finished, Fahlberg continued to work in Remsen’s lab on various things, such as developing coal tar derivatives.

On the momentous day in question, after working in the lab, Fahlberg was at home about to tuck into his meal when he noticed that the bread roll he’d just taken a bite out of tasted incredibly sweet. After ruling out the possibility of the bread roll being made that way, Fahlberg came to the conclusion that he must have accidentally spilled a chemical onto his hands. Rather than immediately sticking his finger down his throat and throwing up, then rushing to a hospital, Fahlberg reportedly became positively excited at the thought of his new discovery. (Yes, the first non-toxic artificial sweetener was discovered because a scientist didn’t wash his hands after getting chemicals all over them- not unlike how the effects of LSD were discovered.)

At this point, Fahlberg didn’t know which of the many chemicals he’d been working with that day had caused the sweet taste he’d experienced. With no alternative in mind, he resorted to going back to his lab and tasting every chemical he’d left on his desk, FOR SCIENCE! (Note: Nobel Prize winner Barry J. Marshall once did something equally daring, FOR SCIENCE, when he chose to drink the bacteria he thought caused ulcers to prove that they did.)

In any event, Fahlberg eventually discovered the source of the sweet chemical, a beaker filled with sulfobenzoic acid, phosphorus chloride and ammonia. This deadly sounding cocktail had boiled over earlier in the day, creating benzoic sulfinide, a compound Fahlberg was familiar with, but had never had a reason to try shoving into his mouth before that day.

Fahlberg quickly penned a paper with Remsen describing the compound and the methods of creating it. Published in 1879, the paper listed both Remsen and Fahlberg as the compounds creators. However, just a few short years later, after realising the compound’s massive commercial potential, Fahlberg changed his mind and when he patented saccharin in 1886, he listed himself as the sole creative mind behind it. Fahlberg had also applied for an earlier patent on a method of creating saccharin cheaply and efficiently in 1884.

There is no agreed upon consensus on who exactly came up with what in regards to saccharin; some sources say Remsen wanted to be listed as a co-discovered purely because saccharin was discovered in his lab. This is supported by the fact that it’s noted that by the time Fahlberg came onto the scene, Remsen was the president of John Hopkins University and was, thus, absent from lab most of the time. Others claim Remsen was instrumental in the discovery, supported by the fact that earlier in his life he had published many papers on sulfobenzoic acids.  As for what Remsen had to say of the matter, “Fahlberg is a scoundrel. It nauseates me to hear my name mentioned in the same breath with him.”

Regardless, Fahlberg’s new artificial sweetener, advertised as a “non-fattening” alternative to sugar, was fairly successful right off the bat in the states, though it wouldn’t be until sugar shortages in WWI that it would became a widespread hit.

For those of you who are curious, the body doesn’t metabolise saccharin, meaning it has no caloric or nutritional value, unlike sugar. And for all you health conscious types- no, saccharin isn’t dangerous to humans.

This may come as a surprise considering that starting in the 1970s, and as recent as a a little over a decade ago, the widespread belief was that it caused cancer. This was despite the fact that in 1974 the National Academy of Sciences performed a review of all the studies done on saccharin and determined that there was no sound evidence that saccharin was a carcinogen and that the only studies that claimed to show it was were flawed or otherwise ambiguous in their results.

One particular flawed study from the 1970s was nearly the final nail in the coffin of saccharin when the researchers found that saccharin could lead to bladder cancer in rats.  This spurred the Saccharin Study and Labeling Act of 1977, which managed to thwart efforts to ban saccharin outright, instead simply getting it a severe warning label: “Use of this product may be hazardous to your health. This product contains saccharin which has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.”

The rats in the study did indeed have a high rate of bladder tumors.  However, beyond any potential flaws in methodology, there is the obvious caveat that, while similar in some ways, rodents and humans aren’t exactly the same (shocker); so further studies needed to be done to see if the same thing occurred in humans.

What was happening with the rats is that specific attributes in their urine (high pH, high proteins, and high calcium phosphate) was, combined with the undigested saccharin, causing microcrystals to form in their bladders.  This led to damage of their bladder lining, which over time led to tumors forming as their bladders were continually having to be repaired.

Once the exact cause of the tumors was determined, exhaustive tests were done to see if the same thing was happening with primates. In the end, the results came up completely negative, with no such microcrystals forming.

Thanks to this, in 2000, saccharin was removed from U.S. National Toxicology Program’s list of substances that might cause cancer. The next year, both the state of California and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration removed it from their list of cancer causing substances.  In 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency concurred, stating that “saccharin is no longer considered a potential hazard to human health.”

The 1970s wasn’t the first time this compound came under fire. A much earlier and equally as unfounded panic occurred as a result of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. Harvey Wiley, the director of the bureau of chemistry for the USDA, considered saccharin inferior to sugar and lobbied hard against it, even going so far as telling president Teddy Roosevelt that “Everyone who ate that sweet corn was deceived. He thought he was eating sugar, when in point of fact he was eating a coal tar product totally devoid of food value and extremely injurious to health.”

While he got the “totally devoid of food value” part correct, the latter “injurious to health” part wasn’t actually backed by any vetted evidence at the time (or since).

Roosevelt, who ate saccharin regularly, stated, “Anybody who says saccharin is injurious to health is an idiot.”

Needless to say, Wiley soon lost much of his credibility and his job. !!!

Bonus Fact:

  • Saccharin should technically be referred to as, “anhydroorthosulphaminebenzoic acid.” Fahlberg picked something different for obvious reasons. The name chosen, saccharin, is derived from the word, “saccharine” meaning “of or resembling sugar.”  This ultimately derived from the Latin “saccharon,” meaning “sugar,” which itself ultimately derived from the Sanskrit “sarkara,” meaning “gravel, grit.”

SOURCE:::: http://www.today i foundout.com

Natarajan

” நீ கபட சந்நியாசி பற்றி கேட்டிருக்கியா …” ?

கபட சந்யாஸி”

“பெரியவா கேட்ட காளிதாஸன் கதை”

10446567_708688765887673_5573865802015963241_n.jpg

சொன்னவர்-ராமகிருஷ்ண தீக்ஷிதர்

தொகுத்தவர்-டி.எஸ்.கோதண்டராம சர்மா

தட்டச்சு-வரகூரான் நாராயணன்.

ஸ்ரீ மகாப் பெரியவாளிடம் பொழுது போக்குகளும்

நிறைய உண்டு.

ஒரு தடவை சென்னை திருமங்கலத்திலிருந்து

அம்பத்தூருக்கு சென்று கொண்டிருந்தோம்.

வழக்கப்படி, ஸ்ரீ பெரியவாள், மூன்று சக்கர

சைக்கிளைத் தொட்டுக்கொண்டே நடந்து வந்து

கொண்டிருந்தார். நாங்கள் ஏழெட்டுப் பேர்கள்,

உடன் சென்று கொண்டிருந்தோம்.

“நீலகண்டா, நீ கபட ஸந்யாஸியைப்

பார்த்திருக்கியா?”

“இல்லே”

“நாகராஜா….நீ”

“இல்லே..”

ஸ்ரீ பெரியவாள் என்னைப் பார்த்து, ” நீ கபட சந்யாஸியைப்

பற்றிக் கேட்டிருக்கியா?” என்று கேட்டார்.

“கேட்டிருக்கேன்…ராவணன்,அர்ஜுனன்…” என்றேன்.

“அவ்வளவு தானா?”

நான் தயங்கியபடியே, “காளிதாஸன்…” என்றேன்.

“காளிதாஸனா?..அவன் எப்போ கபட சந்யாஸி ஆனான்?..”

“பெரியவாளுக்குத் தெரியும்..பெரியவா சொன்னா,

நாங்க கேட்டுண்டே..நடப்போம்.

“இல்லை..நீயே சொல்லு..”

போஜராஜன் சபையில் ஆஸ்தான வித்வானாக இருந்த

காளிதாஸன், ஒரு நாள், சற்று மரியாதைக்குறைவான

சொல்லைக் கேட்டதும், சபையிலிருந்து வெளியேறி

கால் போன போக்கில் நடக்கத் தொடங்கினான்.

போஜனுக்கு, காளிதாஸன் இல்லாமல் பொழுது

போகவில்லை. அவனை எப்படிக் கண்டு பிடிப்பது?

ஒரு செய்யுளின்,முதல் இரண்டு அடிகளை எழுதிப்

பூர்த்தி செய்பவருக்குப் பரிசு கிடைக்கும் என்ற

முரசறைவித்தான்.

ஒரு தாசியின் வீட்டிலிருந்த காளிதாஸன், பரிசு பற்றி

எதுவும் அறிந்திராவிட்டாலும், செய்யுளைப் பூர்த்தி

செய்தான்.போஜனிடம் அந்த வரிகளைக் காட்டினாள் தாசி.

பின்னர்,அவளிடமிருந்து விபரங்கள் பெற்று,மாறுவேஷத்தில்

போஜன் புறப்பட்டுச் சென்றான். ஒரு மரத்தடியில் ஒரு

சந்யாஸியைப் பார்த்தபோது, ‘இவர் காளிதாஸனோ’

என்ற சந்தேகம் வந்தது.

பரஸ்பரம் பேச்சு ஆரம்பமாயிற்று.

துறவி, மாறுவேஷத்திலிருந்த போஜனைப் பார்த்து

“நீங்கள் யார்?” என்று கேட்டார்.

“நான்,போஜனிடம் அடைப்பக்காரனாக இருந்தேன்.

அவர் இறந்ததும், எனக்கு இருக்கப் பிடிக்கவில்லை.

வெளியே வந்து விட்டேன்…”

“ஆ!…. என் போஜன் இறந்துவிட்டானா?”

என்று வருந்தி சரம சுலோகம் பாடியதும்,

வேஷக்காரன் கீழே விழுந்து உயிர் விட்டான்.

அவன்தான் போஜன் என்பது சந்தேகமில்லாமல்

தெரிந்துவிடவே, அம்பாளைக் குறித்து,மனமுருகி

சியாமளா தண்டகம் பாடி, “இதோ,போஜன்

எழுந்துவிட்டான்!” என்ற பொருள்பட

இன்னொரு சுலோகம் பாடினான்.

உண்மையாகவே,போஜன் உயிர் பெற்று எழுந்தான்.

இந்தக் கதையை விளக்கமாகச் சொன்னேன்.

கடைசியில் “இந்த சந்தர்ப்பத்தில் தான் காளிதாஸன்,

சந்யாஸியாகக் கபட நாடகம் ஆடினான்…” என்றேன்.

பெரியவாள்,”ரொம்ப சுவாரஸ்யமா இருந்தது.

நடந்து வந்த களைப்பே தெரியல்லே!” என்றார்.

அம்பத்தூர் வந்துவிட்டது.

SOURCE:::: http://www.periva.proboards.com

Natarajan
Read more: http://periva.proboards.com/thread/8339/#ixzz3LVWMPB7a

” Miracles Of Aviation History …With Happy Endings” !!!

Dietmar Eckell travels the world to photograph plane wrecks where everyone survived. He told BBC Culture why he decided to find crashes with happy endings.

Fairchild C-82A Packet, Alaska

January 1965, Alaska. A Fairchild C-82 is flying above the Arctic Circle when it encounters trouble. “The plane’s electric system failed and they crash-landed in the night in the tundra forest, cutting down many trees. They survived at -45 degrees Celsius by making a big fire from the wood they had cut. It is very remote up there: they were really lucky that the fire was spotted by another plane three days later and they were rescued.” German photographer Dietmar Eckell is describing one of the stories he discovered while researching his Happy End project, which records plane crashes that had no fatalities. He has even been contacted by those who survived: raising the money to print a book of the photos last year, he was contacted by the pilot of this Fairchild C-82. “He sent me an email to thank me for writing down his story and documenting his plane almost 50 years after the crash.”

 

Cessna 310, Australia

Eckell became interested in documenting wrecks where everyone survived after he had his own crash: flying a paraglider with an engine to take aerial shots over the Mojave Desert in California, he went into a tailspin and landed alone with a broken ankle. “While recovering from surgery I had time to search the internet for crash landings in remote locations with no fatalities.” He makes sure they were happy endings before he documents them: “I found planes where all survived the landing but a few started walking and were never found – if [even] one passenger did not make it, the plane is not included in the series.”

Grumman Hu-16 Albatross, Mexico

He finds the planes online, via “pilot forums, archives, accident reports and websites about World War Two history”. Pinpointing the exact location can be tricky. “Once the story is confirmed I try to find it on Google Earth. If the resolution is not good enough I ask at the local airport and most of the time pilots can help. Sometimes I have to hire a plane to search from above. Then I hike out there.” This plane is on a beach 70km south of Puerto Escondido. Eckell photographed it in September 2010, six years after it crashed: “It was half sunk and already broken in two pieces. On the pictures I saw [online] from 2006 … the engines looked like they would still work. But in four years the Pacific had done massive damage.” He happened to be shooting when a storm was passing. “The clouds were changing every minute. The scenery looked unreal through the viewer of my camera … more like a painting – surreal – with different lines of clouds towards the horizon.” It might not be there for much longer. “With the force of the waves the wreck is disappearing fast.”

 

Bristol Type 170 Freighter, Northwest Territories, Canada

Eckell has even tracked down planes that locals don’t know about. “One time I needed a float plane to get to a lake 400km away and could not afford a charter. After three days I found a retired pilot who was willing to take me there – although he did not believe that I had the location of an abandoned plane that he had never heard of in his 30 years as a local pilot. He was very surprised when we found the plane in great condition resting on the side of the lake, where it had been since 1956.”

 

Avro Shackleton, Western Sahara

The journey on foot to a plane can be hard-going. “Physically the hikes through swamps with all your gear are tough because your feet are wet all day, there are mosquitos and every kilometre feels like 5km.” He remembers his attempt to reach this plane in Western Sahara as particularly dangerous. “It’s in an area that is controlled by Polisario rebels. After a 30-hour car ride from Morocco to Mauritania and a 26-hour ride on an ore train, I got to a mining town and there had to convince the local Polisario leader to take me over the border to the Western Sahara. I had the plane’s GPS location and we drove cross country to avoid getting caught by the Mauritanian military. We had a very old car and after an hour it developed a flat tyre; but everything worked out and I got great shots of an Avro Shackleton. What I found interesting was that the same rebel group also rescued the 19 passengers in 1994.”

 

Douglas C-53 Skytrooper, Australia

Happy End is part of a longer-term project, called Restwert. “It started in the days before GPS when I was riding my motorbike in the remote Sahara following track descriptions with a map and compass. Some of the described landmarks along the way were car wrecks.” After photographing these ‘landmark wrecks’, Eckell went on to document abandoned mobile homes in the Mojave Desert. “With my photography I try to create curiosity for the story behind the picture.” This is one of the planes he has photographed most recently. It was forced to land in 1942 when the pilot missed the airport and ran out of fuel.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Douglas C-47 Skytrain, Yukon, Canada

There is an eerie dissonance between the wrecks and the majestic landscapes in the background, one that Eckell exploits to tell his story. “My ‘restwert’ photography is about abandoned objects forgotten in nowhere. When viewers see a photograph of a plane resting on a mountain or a tank sitting on a coral reef they want to know what happened … ‘Restwert’ is German for ‘residual value’ – the material value is written off, but the beauty, stories, and associations they trigger remain. I document these objects before nature takes them back to preserve their memory.” Ten people survived when this plane flew into the side of a mountain in February 1950. Eckell has visited the site twice. “I spent two hours at the wreck and still cannot imagine how they survived in February 1950 with temperatures in the -40s up there.”

 

Curtiss C-46 Commando, Manitoba, Canada

He sees the wrecks as beautiful, both because they represent a happy ending and because many of the planes have survived the ravages of nature. “Old airplanes, like the DC-3 or Curtiss Commando, are design classics and timeless beauties. Aluminium does not erode so they still look pretty good even after 70 years in the bush.” Eckell draws on artists from a different age. “I was inspired by the shipwreck painters of the Romantic period and in my photography also look for dramatic skies, late light or fall colours.”

 

B-24 Liberator, Papua New Guinea

“The locals in Papua New Guinea called this wreck ‘Swamp Ghost’,” says Eckell, who photographed it in March 2013. “When we arrived a heavy rain started and we had to hide under the wing for over an hour.” Trying to get the shot he wanted from a high vantage point, he climbed a tree. “Soon after I noticed that it was the home of giant ants. By the time I could get to a decent shot position they were all over me and it was difficult to focus.” The B-24 was forced to land in a sago swamp in October 1943, after running low on fuel after a bombing mission. The crew successfully parachuted to the ground, and the two pilots were unhurt in the crash landing.

 

Curtiss C-46 Commando, Manitoba, Canada

“I was in Calgary documenting the abandoned Olympic Ski Jump,” says Eckell, describing his journey to photograph this plane, which crashed near Churchill in 1979. “I took my octocopter which got a lot of attention from the biologists on the train who work at the Polar Bear Research Centre in Churchill. It’s not a good idea to walk out to the wreck – this is polar bear country and they are hungry in summer because they haven’t eaten anything since the ice melted.” He got a lift from a local, and took the pictures quickly. “The plane is sitting on huge rocks – the crew was lucky to crash in November with snow softening the impact.”

SOURCE:::: Fiona Macdonald  in http://www.bbc.com

Natarajan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

” Making Of a Musical Legend …” … M.S Subbulakshmi @ Music Academy !!!

  • M.S. Subbulakshmi gave her first public performance in Madras at a concert organised by the Indian Fine Arts Society on December 28, 1933
    The Hindu

    M.S. Subbulakshmi gave her first public performance in Madras at a concert organised by the Indian Fine Arts Society on December 28, 1933

Despite being a regular in the city’s concert circuit from 1933, earning a slot at the prestigious The Music Academy was not easy for M.S. Subbulakshmi

It was 81 years ago in 1933, when a 16-year-old M.S. Subbulakshmi moved from Madurai to the big city of Madras.

Madras city, up until then, unfamiliar with the young singer, witnessed her first public performance at a concert organised by the Indian Fine Arts Society on December 28, the same year.

Accompanied by T. Gururajappa on the violin and her mother on the veena, Subbulakshmi performed at Saundarya Mahal in George Town.

Despite receiving rave reviews and becoming a regular in the city’s concert circuit, earning a slot at the prestigious The Music Academy was not easy. M.S. had to prove herself before she could stake her claim to the Academy’s stage.

In 1934, M.S. enthusiastically participated in the theory sessions and lecture demonstrations during the Academy’s annual music conference. But, it was only in 1935 M.S. got an opportunity to showcase her talent at the Academy’s annual season.

The Hindu, on January 1, 1935, published a four-line listing of the concert in the ‘Engagements for tomorrow’ column on page 12 of the paper. It read, ‘5.30 p.m.–7.30 p.m. Sri Subbalakshmi of Madura – Vocal, Mr. Sankaranarayana Aiyer – Violin, Hamsa Damayanti – Mridangam…’

The performance proved to be a turning point for M.S., with even The Hindu’s ‘hard-to-please’ music critic K.V. Ramamchandran being impressed.

In a picture of the group of musicians who participated in the music conference, published days after the concert on January 3, 1935, one can spot the adolescent M.S. wedged innocuously between two female artistes.

At the time, the 18-year-old aspiring singer was probably oblivious to the fact that in the years to come, she would become one of the most celebrated cultural icons in the nation.

Therefore, being featured by The Music Academy during the Margazhi season, for the first time in 1935, may have seemed to the young girl, her biggest achievement yet, at that point of time.

Keywords: M.S. SubbulakshmiMusic AcademyCarnatic Music

SOURCE:::: http://www.the hindu.com

Natarajan